Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control & RKBA

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)

6. Ironically, Controllers would have us believe they are on the side of law and order.

Reply to branford (Reply #3)

Wed Aug 26, 2015, 07:28 AM

Aug 2015

They squall mightily if some speak of not complying with registration and confiscation laws. Yet, they feel no compunction to abide by laws that deny them the ability to infringe upon the rights of others.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

New NRA Talking Point Compares Seattle's New "Gun Violence Tax" To A "Poll Tax" [View all] SecularMotion Aug 2015 OP

Yes. Yes, it is. blueridge3210 Aug 2015 #1

It's a tax that directly targets the lawful exercise of a constitutional right. benEzra Aug 2015 #2

They courts will never need to decide the constitutional issue. branford Aug 2015 #3

Ironically, Controllers would have us believe they are on the side of law and order. Nuclear Unicorn Aug 2015 #6

Media matters Misfire. beevul Aug 2015 #4

What other rights should we be taxed for??? ileus Aug 2015 #5

Seattle has discovered a great way melm00se Aug 2015 #7

That's what Chicago did. DonP Aug 2015 #8

An after they're forced to pay the plaintiffs' legal fees after losing the lawsuit, branford Aug 2015 #9

I know that this might be out of your scope melm00se Aug 2015 #10

It's not my area of law, I've not seen the actual lawsuit, I have not reviewed the state preemption branford Aug 2015 #12

Thanks n/t melm00se Aug 2015 #13

Correction to OP: Constitutional talking point. There, all fixed. Eleanors38 Aug 2015 #11