Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control & RKBA

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)

2. 1. It's not a "mere property" right.

Reply to Herman4747 (Reply #1)

Thu Feb 4, 2016, 04:02 PM

Feb 2016

It is a right to self-defense, which is, in itself, a right to life.

2. Alcohol would be mere property and considering that there is no moral right to intoxication yet alcohol leads to accidents, violent crimes, sexual assaults, domestic violence, child abuse, etc. I'm willing to wager your professed commit to life over things will be found "conflicted" if your policy preferences were applied to alcohol.

3. Of the 100+ million gun owners in the US only the barest fraction are a danger to you or anyone else. In fact, the vast majority of the truly dangerous ones are already criminals.

4. Speaking of reinforcing RW talking points...

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

23 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Is the "well-regulated" argument for gun control inadvertently reinforcing RW talking points? [View all] Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2016 OP

WHAT THE HELL??? Herman4747 Feb 2016 #1

1. It's not a "mere property" right. Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2016 #2

sure are a lot of gun toting pre-school dangerous criminals in the USa nt msongs Feb 2016 #3

What does that even mean? Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2016 #4

That poster seldom makes sense DonP Feb 2016 #7

It's like having someone angrily throw a fistful of feathers at you. Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2016 #8

A switchblade can be used in "self-defense"... Herman4747 Feb 2016 #9

If someone used a switchblade to fight of a violent criminal attacker that law would serve no Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2016 #11

Yes. beevul Feb 2016 #15

do you know why switchblades are banned? gejohnston Feb 2016 #17

I don't think that call is yours to make.... beevul Feb 2016 #5

If it were about "right to life", benEzra Feb 2016 #6

Interesting that you should mention "bicycle"... Herman4747 Feb 2016 #10

How about alcohol? No one ever stopped an attacker by getting drunk. Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2016 #12

I'm not in a place where I can commute, benEzra Feb 2016 #21

False dichotomy. Lizzie Poppet Feb 2016 #19

walk like an egyptian jimmy the one Feb 2016 #13

So you're adopting the RW interpretations. Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2016 #14

The following are taken from the Oxford English Dictionary... discntnt_irny_srcsm Feb 2016 #16

bracketing jimmy the one Feb 2016 #22

re: "Controlling citizen's arms was not much a concern in 1791, they weren't as dangerous..." discntnt_irny_srcsm Feb 2016 #23

Since the amendment doesn't restrict the RKBA to the militia... Lizzie Poppet Feb 2016 #18

You're correct but it's t fictions of others we're confronting. Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2016 #20