Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Matrosov

(1,098 posts)
11. It doesn't solve anything at all
Mon Jun 20, 2016, 09:08 PM
Jun 2016

How do we define assault rifles? By the definition of the 1994 law? That focused on cosmetic aspects of the rifles. The reality was that after the 1994 ban everybody could still purchase an AR15 that was functionally the exact same as an AR15 before the 1994 ban.

We could reinstate the 1994 ban tomorrow and it would literally stop zero people from walking into the next night club with an AR15 and maybe killing 100 people. 'It's better than nothing.' No, nothing is still nothing.

Want to get rid of AR15s? Ban semi-automatic rifles in general. But then you'd still have to figure out a way to get the tens of millions of existing semi-automatic rifles off the streets.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»You know you're in troubl...»Reply #11