Yes. (Reply #55) - Democratic Underground

In the discussion thread: Gun maker wants industry to give 'smart guns' a shot [View all]

Response to friendly_iconoclast (Reply #54)

Wed Sep 7, 2016, 11:34 PM

deathrind (1,786 posts)

55. Yes.

Provided the firearm manufacture or dealer sells a weapon with in the legal framework set up for firearm sales they should not be held liable for what a person does with the firearm.

Having said that I would like to see that legal framework expanded but holding them liable if they have followed existing laws makes about as much sense as holding Budweiser liable because they brewed the beer or the grocery store liable because they sold the 12 pack.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

56 replies	Author	Time	Post
Gun maker wants industry to give 'smart guns' a shot [View all]	SecularMotion	May 2016	OP
Fine	Duckhunter935	May 2016	#1
No problem as long as there are no mandates. nt	hack89	May 2016	#2
This is a good product and woks instantly and as reliably as the same shotgun without	flamin lib	May 2016	#3
Unless ...	Straw Man	May 2016	#4
Your argument is sooooooooo tedious.	flamin lib	May 2016	#5
Tedious it may very well be, but you haven't actually refuted it	friendly_iconoclast	May 2016	#6
Thats going to leave a mark.	beevul	May 2016	#8
Barring further explanation, I say that endorsement of the shotgun is a) phony, or...	friendly_iconoclast	May 2016	#11
Yes, facts are so tedious, aren't they?	Straw Man	May 2016	#9
Do you see and hear those warnings	Duckhunter935	Sep 2016	#16
Or your wife needs it...	ileus	Sep 2016	#13
The battery dies	Duckhunter935	Sep 2016	#15
This message was self-deleted by its author	CompanyFirstSergeant	May 2016	#7
Fine with me. If it works, folks will scarf 'em up. nt	Eleanors38	May 2016	#10
I bet some figures out how to hack it.	Hangingon	Sep 2016	#12
Forgive my vacuum tube tech, but I remember the old "pulse" notion...	Eleanors38	Sep 2016	#17
Cheap does not come into it.	Hangingon	Sep 2016	#19
Prohibition WILL go unchecked if not opposed...	Eleanors38	Sep 2016	#20
Eh? Looks like word salad to me. nt	flamin lib	Sep 2016	#22
Ears wide shut, eh?	Eleanors38	Sep 2016	#24
What do you expect from somebody that thinks the AR15 is a military issue weapon?	DonP	Sep 2016	#25
I know, isn't that the person	Duckhunter935	Sep 2016	#26
Yup, The "World's Foremost Authority" in Castle Bansalot - not a high bar	DonP	Sep 2016	#32
IMNSHO some of the usual suspects...	discntnt_irny_srcsm	Sep 2016	#33
After having their hat handed to them for 3 or 4 years ...	DonP	Sep 2016	#35
re: "I don't believe it "jumped" 12 points in 2 years."	discntnt_irny_srcsm	Sep 2016	#36
I never believed it dropped off after '94 either	DonP	Sep 2016	#44
re: "Nobody's suggesting a mass confiscation of Persian Kittens ... at least not yet."	discntnt_irny_srcsm	Sep 2016	#46
If he read what I said, he would have paid close attention to the last 2 sentences.	Eleanors38	Sep 2016	#28
Uh, no. Just hard to follow all the conspiracy and try follow any thread of reason.	flamin lib	Sep 2016	#29
I suggest that you remember that you run neither this website nor this group...	friendly_iconoclast	Sep 2016	#30
Speaking of this DEMOCRATIC	sarisataka	Sep 2016	#34
Says the supporter of a group that just endorsed 2 repukes. N/T	beevul	Sep 2016	#37
I am sure that poster	Duckhunter935	Sep 2016	#43
Wow, so now you think you are a host here in this group?	Duckhunter935	Sep 2016	#42
i trust mossberg	beergood	Sep 2016	#14
I may be misunderstanding, but I think...	benEzra	Sep 2016	#18
understood	beergood	Sep 2016	#21
Uh, no. nt	flamin lib	Sep 2016	#23
Is it on the market or an introduction date set yet, been 6 months	Duckhunter935	Sep 2016	#27
iGun says they won't introduce it until mandates are off the table.	benEzra	Sep 2016	#41
I agree with mandates	Duckhunter935	Sep 2016	#45
Wouldn't that be disagreeing with mandates? N/T	beevul	Sep 2016	#50
Badly worded	Duckhunter935	Sep 2016	#52
It's been five months since you endorsed it. Have you managed to actually test it yet?	friendly_iconoclast	Sep 2016	#31
This message was self-deleted by its author	benEzra	Sep 2016	#39
Uh, yes. I just checked. Jonathan Mossberg runs a small startup (iGun), not O.F. Mossberg.	benEzra	Sep 2016	#38
It is ironic that the people who want to throw their neighbors in jail...	benEzra	Sep 2016	#40
I doubt very much the OP and his second banana care for this quote from Jonathan Mossberg:	friendly_iconoclast	Sep 2016	#47
But, but, it's as reliable as his $35,000 Pick em Up truck!	DonP	Sep 2016	#48
If he returns to tout the Electro-Mossberg again, be sure to remind him of Mossberg's own words	friendly_iconoclast	Sep 2016	#49
Now who could that quote be from?	Duckhunter935	Sep 2016	#53
Good luck to this guy...	deathrind	Sep 2016	#51
Do you agree with what he said in an interview last year?:	friendly_iconoclast	Sep 2016	#54
Yes.	deathrind	Sep 2016	#55
Of course, Mossberg is secretly forging one ring to control them all . . .	LongtimeAZDem	Sep 2016	#56

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.