Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Peer Review [View all]TPaine7
(4,286 posts)25. ...
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
47 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
See post 4 and attempt to reply with substance, assuming that's not too much trouble. n/t
TPaine7
Jun 2012
#9
I know what he means, as well. Unfortunately for both of you- he's wrong. See post #27
friendly_iconoclast
Jun 2012
#28
The genetic fallacy again, eh? It doesn't matter where it was posted, he's still wrong.
friendly_iconoclast
Jun 2012
#36
Of course it matters where information comes from. Guncite is a propaganda site.
DanTex
Jun 2012
#37
And you've yet to prove me wrong. I admit Kopsch's testimony is hearsay...
friendly_iconoclast
Jun 2012
#38
There still are plenty of bullets available that will penetrate body armor- rifle bullets.
friendly_iconoclast
Jun 2012
#40
Unfortunately for you, that source directly contradicts your claims.
friendly_iconoclast
Jun 2012
#27
Yes! Do you think that valid points will stop being made because you express displeasure?
TPaine7
Jun 2012
#18
I wish he would ignore this whole group. He has already done me the favor of ignoring me and life
Tuesday Afternoon
Jun 2012
#45