Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Why we have a second amendment [View all]TPaine7
(4,286 posts)33. "No changes in DC or Chicago so far."
Bullshit.
Laws have been changed in both DC and Chicago.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
38 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
True, but does anyone know why the anti-gun folks disregard the holding in the Heller case?
AnotherMcIntosh
Aug 2012
#5
I'm pretty sure that was sarcasm. But I've been wrong once or thrice.... n/t
PavePusher
Aug 2012
#29
Sounds to me like you haven't read the fine points of Heller. Nor the dissenting opinions to those
Hoyt
Aug 2012
#10
White supremacist gun nuts form them now. Show gun and spout bigotry is all required for membership.
Hoyt
Aug 2012
#13
It's not settled obviously. No changes in DC or Chicago so far. New cases with slightly different
Hoyt
Aug 2012
#16
They've been ordered to change they are just unamerican and ignoring the rulings
Missycim
Aug 2012
#18
Well good, Why don't you gun owners get your guns and a bunch of your buddies and go to Pennsylvania
upaloopa
Aug 2012
#3
Maybe so. So how do you reconcile citizens walking around armed in public out of "original intent?"
Hoyt
Aug 2012
#14
Walking around armed in public is just a happy side-effect of the second amendment.
Atypical Liberal
Aug 2012
#19
that is part of it but, (to me) the broader intent of 2A and why it is so important is that --
Tuesday Afternoon
Aug 2012
#36