Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: New policy discussion regarding individual and group insults [View all]Remmah2
(3,291 posts)14. Everything is right wing from some people's perspective.
nt
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
108 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I nominate the term "home invasion" for banning from discussion in this forum....
mike_c
Aug 2012
#2
The term "home invasion" is a term used by the courts, by the various state legislators, by the FBI
AnotherMcIntosh
Aug 2012
#78
If you're looking for good scholarship about the Second Amendment (and the Fourteenth) I would start
TPaine7
Aug 2012
#60
Basically you want a one sided argument and your opinions unchallenged?
Reasonable_Argument
Aug 2012
#27
I figure if there's a legitimate point to be made, you can find it from a legitimate source.
DanTex
Aug 2012
#39
Too bad that "study" you post is full of garbage pseudo-science and hoopla. nt
rDigital
Aug 2012
#53
When the peers are fellow anti-gun extremists, I call their impartiality into question.
rDigital
Aug 2012
#65
So the mainstream scientific establishment is now "anti-gun extremists". Hmm....
DanTex
Aug 2012
#69
Do you define a Democrat as only a member of the party that agrees with your personal views? ...
spin
Aug 2012
#91
It is often extremely difficult to find an acceptable "liberal" source that supports RKBA ...
spin
Sep 2012
#97
The problem with that is that it's not always crystal clear what constitutes a right-wing source
slackmaster
Sep 2012
#100
Without google dumps, the anti-gun nut population here would be cut in half
shadowrider
Aug 2012
#51
Well then, thank you for single handedly providing so much low hanging fruit for the pro gunners.
rDigital
Aug 2012
#83
The problem is, the juries are handling it, when it's a pro-gun post in question.
shadowrider
Sep 2012
#107
I vote "No" - no list of unacceptable terms, and no in-group punishment system
petronius
Aug 2012
#12
The issue seems incredibly simple to me, krispos42. It's argumentum ad hominem.
slackmaster
Sep 2012
#102
They feel free to shit on the RKBA forum because the juries rarely hide posts from antis.
rDigital
Aug 2012
#54
Censorship mostly unnecessary. But if you must, use of term "Responsible" for public carriers
Hoyt
Aug 2012
#55