Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: simple question [View all]bongbong
(5,436 posts)35. Even more laughs!
> Defined by case law not to be changed in either of our lifetimes is how I would describe the "well regulated militia", and that definition has nothing to do with what you wish it mean
First of all you don't know what I "wished it meant", and secondly of all you're wrong, and thirdly of all you've just made a bunch of assertions without any proof at all.
Your NRA Talking Points booklet should have more background info in it.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
41 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It seems to me that one doesn't need automatic or semi automatic weapons to go hunting
Pyrzqxgl
Sep 2012
#2
The second amendment is not, has never been, and will never be about hunting.
bad sofa king
Sep 2012
#14
It seems to me that the word "hunting" or any variation thereof is not mentioned
4th law of robotics
Sep 2012
#17
I suspect that you are hurting the gun control side of the debate far more than you are helping it.
spin
Sep 2012
#40
Actually, you didn't answer the question asked in the post to which you responded.
MercutioATC
Sep 2012
#31
Some kid brought a gun into the school cafeteria and just started shooting ... eom
Kolesar
Sep 2012
#18
Empirical evidence that after controlling for all other factors guns
4th law of robotics
Sep 2012
#16