Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: The second amendment is irrelevant- [View all]friendly_iconoclast
(15,333 posts)136. I think he Shares our almost United opinion that Loudly once went by another name here...
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
145 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
There is no way to construe that through grammar, history or legal precedent.
PavePusher
Sep 2012
#129
How did we get to the point were we are at today? How did we get to the place where gunners
upaloopa
Sep 2012
#10
What is an opinion? Is it just some thought like a wisp that floats around in the air and has no
upaloopa
Sep 2012
#27
I think I understand were you are coming from. I respect your right to your opinion and your
upaloopa
Sep 2012
#43
I feel that the gun lobby is not rational. Instead of gun nut I could say irrational gun people.
upaloopa
Sep 2012
#52
That is complete bullshit. You don't hear from the majority because they don't make
upaloopa
Sep 2012
#85
Wrong 2A is there to protect us against a standing army. Reread your history books.
Peepsite
Sep 2012
#12
that's easy: for you, any change to current regulations are not reasonable unless
Warren Stupidity
Sep 2012
#101
can you show me one statement of you supporting any proposed new regulation?
Warren Stupidity
Sep 2012
#108
We are in a very different position today and have every defensive implement that
digonswine
Sep 2012
#72
That takes care of the 6 million NRA members - what about the 50 million non-NRA gun owners?
hack89
Sep 2012
#46
How do you propose to convince 1/4 of the population that they are perverts?
friendly_iconoclast
Sep 2012
#143
I think he Shares our almost United opinion that Loudly once went by another name here...
friendly_iconoclast
Sep 2012
#136
The right to own, say, and do anything is assumed. All rights exist until they are restricted...
slackmaster
Sep 2012
#90
Well no, if you read the history it was originally all about local militias
Warren Stupidity
Sep 2012
#79
It does not matter if the second amendment is obsolete or not. It is LAW.
Atypical Liberal
Sep 2012
#87
Cool straw man, bro. The presence of firearms is clearly what makes Somalia so dangerous. nt
rDigital
Sep 2012
#119
"It applies only to a standing militia..." Well, no, actually; it applies to the people.
PavePusher
Sep 2012
#128