Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
The image seems pretty innocuous to me ... mr_lebowski Apr 2020 #1
Same here. Now I've got to start hoarding the old boxes. NT mahatmakanejeeves Apr 2020 #2
It's an image of a NA woman on her knees. SunSeeker Apr 2020 #3
It's an image of a young NA woman on her knees looking up submissively. SunSeeker Apr 2020 #4
Ummm ... no, it's nothing whatsoever like that anymore ... mr_lebowski Apr 2020 #9
Ummm...yes it was. Here's the packaging that was dropped in February 2020: SunSeeker Apr 2020 #11
Are you calling me a liar? mr_lebowski Apr 2020 #12
You are showing recent transitional packaging before they dropped her altogether. SunSeeker Apr 2020 #13
How is even the older picture 'showing her as a sex object'? mr_lebowski Apr 2020 #14
They're using a pretty native girl's face/body to sell butter. That's sexual objectification. nt SunSeeker Apr 2020 #15
I think we should just agree to disagree ... nt mr_lebowski Apr 2020 #16
There is the fold-the-cardboard trick too. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2020 #7
Turning her knees into her breasts...a formative part of manhood? SunSeeker Apr 2020 #8
If IT offends our First Nations brothers and sisters then IT'S offensive! Gracias Sunseeker RestoreAmerica2020 Apr 2020 #5
I'm for this although there's a part of me TlalocW Apr 2020 #6
I totally get the complaint on the grounds of cultural appropriation ... mr_lebowski Apr 2020 #10
Sexual objectification enables sex trafficking. SunSeeker Apr 2020 #17
There's nothing sexual about the image ... mr_lebowski Apr 2020 #18
We can agree to disagree. But a depiction of a pretty girl on her knees is sexual. SunSeeker Apr 2020 #19
Yes, we do disagree ... mr_lebowski Apr 2020 #20
You don't seem to understand the concept of sexual objectification. SunSeeker Apr 2020 #22
I really don't think the intent of the Farmers in the MN Co-Op which established the logo in 1928 mr_lebowski Apr 2020 #23
Their intent was to sell butter. Pictures of pretty girls had long been a staple of advertising. SunSeeker Apr 2020 #24
I can see the point about sexual imagery TlalocW Apr 2020 #25
This image has been used 92 years. I don't think "all natural" was a thing back then. SunSeeker Apr 2020 #26
You could make that point TlalocW Apr 2020 #27
It has always bugged me. nt fleabiscuit Apr 2020 #21
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»First Americans»Land O'Lakes Removing Nat...»Reply #16