Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bleacher Creature

(11,256 posts)
7. I agree with everything you said about the drop off.
Fri Jan 26, 2018, 10:13 PM
Jan 2018

Now that the game is supposedly clean, we're seeing more and more power pitchers (like Clemens) and five-tool players (like Bonds) fall off a cliff in their early 30s. As a Yankees fan, having to watch Jacoby Ellsbury hobble around at the cost of $21 million a year is a good reminder.

I'm just making a different point. I'm willing to assume that even if Bonds lost everything after 1998, he was already a Hall of Famer.

I pulled the following chart from this article. https://athlonsports.com/mlb/should-steroids-forever-keep-barry-bonds-and-roger-clemens-out-baseballs-hall-fame



I get that nobody can say for sure that Bonds was clean from 1986-98, but if that's an accurate statement, then Bonds' numbers during that period are still first ballot HOF stats. Three MVPs, 414 HRs, 445 SBs, and eight Gold Gloves are better numbers than players than Cal Ripken put up during his entire career.

Chipper Jones who said... Cattledog Jan 2018 #1
What?!?! Bleacher Creature Jan 2018 #3
Jack Morris and Alan Trammell, Detroit Tigers!! longship Jan 2018 #2
The Post Announcement Interviews... ProfessorGAC Jan 2018 #4
I find it absurd that Bonds isn't in. Bleacher Creature Jan 2018 #5
Problem With That Reasoning, BC. . . ProfessorGAC Jan 2018 #6
I agree with everything you said about the drop off. Bleacher Creature Jan 2018 #7
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Sports»New Cooperstown Baseball ...»Reply #7