Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: Question about the nature of this Group [View all]darkstar3
(8,763 posts)20. Ain't that the truth.
I remember my few visits to the "Christian Liberals" group on DU2. Not much was posted there, and the group often went days without a single post, but what I found most interesting was the content of the few posts I found. It seemed more a place for a litany of complaints about R/T than anything else.
It just goes to show you that discussions don't actually happen unless there is someone with a differing viewpoint.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
36 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
And the difference would be what? The idea that somebody dares to subject religion to critique?
dmallind
Dec 2011
#2
I apologize if my attempt at humor was condescending. I did not intend it to be so. n/t
TygrBright
Dec 2011
#14
actually some of us regulars would welcome posts on buddhism taoism hinduism &c&c
struggle4progress
Dec 2011
#9
1. Whatever the believer believes it means; 2. Which yana? As stated in my post...
TygrBright
Dec 2011
#25
I think it can serve both purposes, but would like to see it more focused on the first.
cbayer
Dec 2011
#24
Did you perhaps miss the "Progressive People of Faith" portion of the group title to the left?
darkstar3
Dec 2011
#27