Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
22. I wrongly attributed TLQ to Clarke in the OP and then edited when it was pointed out to me..
Wed Feb 25, 2015, 07:10 PM
Feb 2015

Very familiar with the story..

"The Last Question" was an Asimov story Kelvin Mace Feb 2015 #1
Oops.. You're right.. Brain fart.. Fumesucker Feb 2015 #2
wiki says: Warren Stupidity Feb 2015 #3
See post #2 Fumesucker Feb 2015 #5
Not my thought at all Kelvin Mace Feb 2015 #21
I wrongly attributed TLQ to Clarke in the OP and then edited when it was pointed out to me.. Fumesucker Feb 2015 #22
The word "sufficiently" is key here. trotsky Feb 2015 #4
I hear they have toasters now bvf Feb 2015 #6
To Bronze age goat herders iron chariots were sufficiently advanced Lordquinton Feb 2015 #15
This of course raises the question skepticscott Feb 2015 #20
Sci-Fi was full of characters with "god-like" powers Kelvin Mace Feb 2015 #32
And don't forget Q! trotsky Feb 2015 #38
In Childhood's End some idiot tried to fire a nuke at the alien guardians, and promptly disappeared. leveymg Feb 2015 #7
I think Clarke's law is no longer valid edhopper Feb 2015 #8
You vastly overestimate the intelligence Kelvin Mace Feb 2015 #33
As I said edhopper Feb 2015 #34
I think this feeds into an evolutionary defense mechanism; our predisposition to faith. AtheistCrusader Feb 2015 #9
Another thing we homo sapiens do is... AlbertCat Feb 2015 #30
One of the reasons I have never fully rejected the belief in god and cbayer Feb 2015 #10
I think I've mentioned before that I'm an agnostic who is also an atheist Fumesucker Feb 2015 #11
I was not clear. I do not think something has evolved further from us. cbayer Feb 2015 #12
What do you mean by "further"? Fumesucker Feb 2015 #13
You and your null statements. cbayer Feb 2015 #14
It's only technology that puts us at the top of the food chain.. Fumesucker Feb 2015 #16
But that technology is due to some very highly evolved intelligence. cbayer Feb 2015 #17
Only if their environment is far more harsh than our own.. Fumesucker Feb 2015 #18
Harsh? How about just different? cbayer Feb 2015 #19
You have no idea what I think may be possible in terms of life.. Fumesucker Feb 2015 #23
I am only responding to what you wrote. cbayer Feb 2015 #24
He wrote quite a bit of stuff that's not in that subgenre, I don't read fantasy either any more Fumesucker Feb 2015 #25
I read the beginning of it, but it didn't grab me. cbayer Feb 2015 #26
I'm kind of limited to what I can find online for free and at the library.. Fumesucker Feb 2015 #27
I see that Childhood's End is in a downloadable format. cbayer Feb 2015 #28
Neither may be your cup of Earl Grey Fumesucker Feb 2015 #29
Of course... AlbertCat Feb 2015 #31
shhh, don't spoil the fun. Warren Stupidity Feb 2015 #37
Sure is entertaining, isn't it? Act_of_Reparation Feb 2015 #43
And I did not say they were. There are other ways to think of cbayer Feb 2015 #39
It's beyond you AlbertCat Feb 2015 #40
I was only repeating what you said to make a point. cbayer Feb 2015 #41
You mean magic? Iggo Feb 2015 #35
Show someone from a thousand years ago the Tsar Bomba Fumesucker Feb 2015 #36
Don't you think edhopper Feb 2015 #42
How about a technology that can make a star go nova? Fumesucker Feb 2015 #45
That would be very advanced technology edhopper Feb 2015 #46
You don't have to go back 1000 years for that. stone space Feb 2015 #44
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Any sufficiently advanced...»Reply #22