Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]Response to muriel_volestrangler (Reply #36)
guillaumeb This message was self-deleted by its author.
Edit history
Cannot view edit history for self-deleted messages.
113 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The confusion arises from the fact that the terms "atheist" and "agnostic" aren't mutually exclusive
trotsky
Aug 2016
#4
Why in the hell do you think he suggested atheist and agnostic are synonyms?
AtheistCrusader
Aug 2016
#14
What is proof? Proof is usually a form of belief, as it often involves having a belief in what one
Doodley
Aug 2016
#105
You say the idea that God cares about people's lives is a 'fairy story'
muriel_volestrangler
Aug 2016
#19
His talk about asteroid strikes is about why he cannot see evidence for a god that cares
muriel_volestrangler
Aug 2016
#32
Tyson was replying to a person who said they thought there must be a god
muriel_volestrangler
Aug 2016
#50
It's part of the game. How it's worded determines who has 'burden of proof.'
immoderate
Aug 2016
#34
Your god pushes the question of the beginning infinitely back in time with a magical being,
cpwm17
Aug 2016
#107
It seems that it's common for theists to be more amazed by the existence of a rock than
cpwm17
Aug 2016
#111
Considering how dishonestly you've had to misstate his position (as many people have pointed out)...
trotsky
Aug 2016
#66
So God can't impetuously change them, as opposed to killing all living things.
immoderate
Aug 2016
#82
I think once a human comes into existence they are what they are in terms of
underthematrix
Aug 2016
#87