Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Reconciling faith and science. [View all]
In my view, it is quite easy to reconcile faith and science. Both involve a search for answers. Answers to different questions, to be sure, but a search all the same.
This fragment from a longer article describes on such method of reconciliation:
Q) What can you tell us about Lemaîtres approach to the intersection of science and faith, and what can we learn from it nearly a century later?
A) His conception of the relationship of science and faith was rather circumspect, carefully delineating their roles as ways of knowing. Science for him was the methodology for understanding the physical cosmos; revealed religion taught truths important for salvation. He was quite content to observe that the findings of science were in no way discordant with scriptural revelation, and vice versa, but neither should overreach. If Lemaître has a lesson for the science-faith discourse today, that would probably be it.
A) His conception of the relationship of science and faith was rather circumspect, carefully delineating their roles as ways of knowing. Science for him was the methodology for understanding the physical cosmos; revealed religion taught truths important for salvation. He was quite content to observe that the findings of science were in no way discordant with scriptural revelation, and vice versa, but neither should overreach. If Lemaître has a lesson for the science-faith discourse today, that would probably be it.
https://www.americamagazine.org/content/all-things/faith-and-science-georges-lemaitre-11-questions-dr-karl-van-bibber
Many of us recognize this as the NOMA solution, the idea that the 2 fields are non-overlapping, each with its own methods.
I would also say, as my personal opinion, that each involves a search for truth, and in that search for truth, each can lead to the Creator.
I do not mean to imply that any, or all, or most scientists are inevitably led to an awareness of the Creator, but that the Creator, as the one who figuratively lit the spark of creation that was the Big Bang, inevitably values knowledge and any expression of the sentience that is referred to in the phrase from Genesis, 1:27, where it is said that the Creator "created mankind in the image and likeness".
So to my mind, seeking knowledge is growing closer to the Creator.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
106 replies, 5887 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
106 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Religion doesn't conflict with other human areas of endeavour when it takes care not to.
Girard442
Apr 2018
#5
But did a literal Creator figuratively light the spark, or was it a figurative Creator?
marylandblue
Apr 2018
#56
It was the response to you, and if answered it other than by reasserting faith
marylandblue
Apr 2018
#102
So if the concept of slavery helps me in life, that's ok for me and my slaves?
marylandblue
Apr 2018
#61
Nothing like getting your moral code from an instruction book for selling your kids into slavery
Major Nikon
Apr 2018
#62
The question is: Does religion concern itself with the physical cosmos?
Act_of_Reparation
Apr 2018
#69