Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Religion

MineralMan

(146,286 posts)

4. The article addresses it poorly, then.

Reply to guillaumeb (Reply #2)

Wed Aug 29, 2018, 03:16 PM

Aug 2018

By ignoring a major factor, it becomes a poor excuse for an article at all. The dispute between Il Papa and Vigano is one of long standing. Worse, one man appears to condone sexual abuse of children through inaction, and the other blames the wrong people for that abuse. That is the real story, which was completely ignored by the author you quoted.

The article is deficient in many ways. I would not have posted it here.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

23 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Doubts about Vigan's accusations aside, Pope Francis needs a better response [View all] guillaumeb Aug 2018 OP

Nothing in there about Vigano's vile homophobic rants? MineralMan Aug 2018 #1

The article addresses this one point. guillaumeb Aug 2018 #2

The article addresses it poorly, then. MineralMan Aug 2018 #4

Perhaps you should address your criticism to the site. eom guillaumeb Aug 2018 #5

It was not me who went to that site and brought the article here. MineralMan Aug 2018 #7

You find them to be flawed. guillaumeb Aug 2018 #8

I would be happy to write such an article. MineralMan Aug 2018 #10

Is this an example of your writing skill? guillaumeb Aug 2018 #15

Nope. When I write here, I occasionally leave a typo, although I do lightly MineralMan Aug 2018 #18

That translates to: I made a mistake. guillaumeb Aug 2018 #19

I don't usually point out others' mistakes in posts. MineralMan Aug 2018 #21

Because that's what the church does, is cover up. trotsky Aug 2018 #3

Both men described in that article are vile. MineralMan Aug 2018 #6

What does "uniquely religious" mean? eom guillaumeb Aug 2018 #9

That you are reflexively covering for religion and don't even want it considered as a factor. trotsky Aug 2018 #11

I can find no definition to support your interpretation. guillaumeb Aug 2018 #16

That's too bad. trotsky Aug 2018 #23

He literally defined it. Lordquinton Aug 2018 #13

No, both of you are incorrect. guillaumeb Aug 2018 #17

What do you think it means? Lordquinton Aug 2018 #20

... Major Nikon Aug 2018 #22

Perhaps you're having trouble understanding his sentence. MineralMan Aug 2018 #14

The RCC is a criminal organization. Voltaire2 Aug 2018 #12