Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

zipplewrath

(16,646 posts)
4. Your correct
Wed Jun 12, 2019, 12:56 PM
Jun 2019
Where child sexual abuse by priests is involved, the so-called "sanctity of the confessional" is overridden by the harm caused to the child, who cannot consent to such sexual acts.


The problem is two fold. First, you have to establish in court that the confessional priest (not the predator) actually was told of the abuse. If you were successful, it wouldn't change much because the priest STILL isn't going to break his vows. So you'll never get testimony out of him.

The real problem is that the priest is following what he considers to be a "higher law". The courts have generally allowed them their protection, but I suspect after all of this stuff, they may be willing to reconsider. Although it is a problem considering how many Catholics are on the Supreme Court.
amen! very well thought out. Too bad the lawyers can't think. demigoddess Jun 2019 #1
I don't know that that particular issue has actually been tested. MineralMan Jun 2019 #2
Although his crimes were different, trev Jun 2019 #3
Your correct zipplewrath Jun 2019 #4
Is there a higher law that requires priests not to rape children? Major Nikon Jun 2019 #5
RCC has defended the confession, repeatedly stopdiggin Jun 2019 #8
We already have a resident member who fills us in on the RCC's position on the subject Major Nikon Jun 2019 #10
you mistake me for an apologist stopdiggin Jun 2019 #12
Didn't say or imply that, but it would be an easy mistake to make Major Nikon Jun 2019 #13
We also have a resident misframer who loves to build with straw. guillaumeb Jun 2019 #15
They're the same person Lordquinton Jun 2019 #30
And very gifted. guillaumeb Jun 2019 #31
Yes zipplewrath Jun 2019 #11
To be fair that's how most religion exerts control Major Nikon Jun 2019 #14
Yup zipplewrath Jun 2019 #16
Sounds a bit like prosperity gospel Major Nikon Jun 2019 #17
Roughly the same thing zipplewrath Jun 2019 #18
The difference is the level of delusion required Major Nikon Jun 2019 #19
Mostly "magical thinking" zipplewrath Jun 2019 #20
Most belief systems include some sort of philosophy Major Nikon Jun 2019 #21
Usually a fundamental feature zipplewrath Jun 2019 #22
Quickly followed by the "your position isn't provable either" Major Nikon Jun 2019 #23
Well, strictly speaking they're correct zipplewrath Jun 2019 #24
I don't even make it that far Major Nikon Jun 2019 #25
My one real caveat zipplewrath Jun 2019 #26
Well, given that such a thing has never occurred, nor has any witness MineralMan Jun 2019 #27
Most atheists don't assert no god exists Major Nikon Jun 2019 #28
I agree on both points zipplewrath Jun 2019 #29
No right is absolute. trotsky Jun 2019 #6
Perhaps there should be a constitutional right to children not getting raped or killed Major Nikon Jun 2019 #7
Yes, gun nuts and religious nuts. MineralMan Jun 2019 #9
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»For Those Who Argue That ...»Reply #4