Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NNadir

(33,513 posts)
18. And that is the reason, the FDA always assembles a committee of scientists to review the data.
Thu Apr 30, 2020, 12:44 PM
Apr 2020

Many drugs are approved on split recommendations. Ultimately however, there are many unknowns and many tradeoffs.

I participated in the development of a drug in the 1990's that treated recalcitrant high blood pressure that was highly observed in people of African American descent. (Omapatrilat) It was expected to be a blockbuster and went all the way through phase III clinical trials. It was abandoned because of a subset of subjects developed angioedema that risked closing their airways.

I always wondered if more people died from strokes from not having blood pressure control than would have died from angioedema. (There were no deaths, but there were statistically significant close calls if I recall correctly.)

The drug might be approvable today if a biomarker for the angioedema side effect could have been identified, i.e. in a "personalized medicine" setting.

I understand that Gilead has ties with Kushner.. That is all we need to know secondwind Apr 2020 #1
yeah, but then it means NJCher Apr 2020 #3
It most assuredly does NOT mean that. The study to which I referred did not rule out... NNadir Apr 2020 #11
so were you aware of what Fauci said when you wrote this post? NJCher Apr 2020 #13
I did not review exactly what he said, but heard it by osmosis. The news item leading to the... NNadir Apr 2020 #16
There is a very valid scientific reason for evaluating this drug in Covid. NNadir Apr 2020 #5
That was my first guess when I heard 15 days shortened to 11 days unblock Apr 2020 #2
Also a nice look over there moment for Trump when he's getting pummeled. gibraltar72 Apr 2020 #4
A few things. Igel Apr 2020 #14
On Remdesivir ... in 1,090 test cases it dropped the mortality rate from 11.6% to 8.0% Botany Apr 2020 #6
We'll see. The study to which I referred did not say the drug didn't have any effect... NNadir Apr 2020 #9
Time will tell. With more numbers treated, it may well reach statistical signficance hlthe2b Apr 2020 #7
after working in big pharma for 25 years, I looked at the data NRaleighLiberal Apr 2020 #8
And that is the reason, the FDA always assembles a committee of scientists to review the data. NNadir Apr 2020 #18
Note: STOPPED early because of adverse events 12% versus 5% in placebo. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2020 #10
That's the impression I had as well reading this. drray23 Apr 2020 #12
Also, it appears that "adverse effects" were more than double in the Remdesivir group... Sancho Apr 2020 #15
Every drug has side effects. This one, since it acts on nucleic acid synthesis... NNadir Apr 2020 #17
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»Clinical Improvement in C...»Reply #18