Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

elleng

(130,713 posts)
15. Drafting:
Sat Mar 16, 2019, 12:17 AM
Mar 2019

Regarding the choice of some governments to regulate religion and thought, Jefferson stated:

The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. But it does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods or no god. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.

Deriving from this statement, Jefferson believed that the Government's relationship with the Church should be indifferent, religion being neither persecuted nor given any special status.

If anything pass in a religious meeting seditiously and contrary to the public peace, let it be punished in the same manner and no otherwise as it had happened in a fair or market.

During his Presidency Jefferson refused to issue proclamations calling for days of prayer and thanksgiving. In a letter to Samuel Miller dated January 23, 1808, Jefferson stated:

But it is only proposed that I should recommend, not prescribe a day of fasting & prayer.

In a letter written to Mordecai Manuel Noah in 1818, Jefferson wrote that America was unique in that it put all religious sects "on an equal footing". This insured that no single religion had state-sponsored domination over any other. However, the state could only do so much; in the same letter, he said that it is up to individuals to behave with religious tolerance towards their neighbors.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_views_of_Thomas_Jefferson#Separation_of_church_and_state

Separation of church and state. onecaliberal Mar 2019 #1
That is all that needs be said. old guy Mar 2019 #2
Indeed. onecaliberal Mar 2019 #3
it should be, but it isnt. mopinko Mar 2019 #4
Ayuh! 2naSalit Mar 2019 #8
Because it offends me, but not too much. elleng Mar 2019 #5
Doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results rickford66 Mar 2019 #6
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, needledriver Mar 2019 #7
ok, let me be less obtuse. mopinko Mar 2019 #9
AHA! elleng Mar 2019 #10
Drafting: elleng Mar 2019 #15
great start. mopinko Mar 2019 #19
was just gonna say that!!! elleng Mar 2019 #21
It's insulting to non-Christians. Irishxs Mar 2019 #11
what if it isnt only christian prayer? mopinko Mar 2019 #12
Pointless exercise Cartoonist Mar 2019 #13
Because Protestants simply don't understand PoindexterOglethorpe Mar 2019 #14
I didn't think of it until now Lordquinton Mar 2019 #16
i had a friend, a good lefty, who was elected alderman of a small town. mopinko Mar 2019 #17
also, they have been inviting other faiths. mopinko Mar 2019 #18
Inviting other faiths isn't the right solution. PoindexterOglethorpe Mar 2019 #22
unnecessary and useless. mopinko Mar 2019 #23
I think all government meetings should start with a prayer, in fact many prayers. rurallib Mar 2019 #20
It's the word separation that was carefully chosen and it's correct. defacto7 Mar 2019 #24
I don't understand the need for prayer Boomer Mar 2019 #25
It's useless, divisive, and not government. LakeArenal Mar 2019 #26
Because the taxpayers have to pay the cost of the lawsuits! yortsed snacilbuper Mar 2019 #27
Jeebus's advice, yortsed snacilbuper Mar 2019 #28
I do not want public officials to take their information Thunderbeast Mar 2019 #29
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Atheists & Agnostics»why shouldnt govt meeting...»Reply #15