Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Hillary had better be careful [View all]Green Forest
(232 posts)75. I hate bullshit moving of goalposts. You said, "the house always wins" which did not happen in 2008.
Then you moved the goalposts and started talking about "comparative" establishment support vis a vis Barack vs. Bernie, which is irrelevant to my original point where I referenced my experience volunteering from Fall 2007-Jan. 2008.
Your point about Barack having as much establishment support as Clinton during that time is bullshit. You proved nothing. Where's the list of Senate endorsements of Hillary versus his? He did not have any Senator but Tom Kaine for quite a while compared to Hillary, which is why Senator Kennedy's endorsement after SC was so important for Barack. For you to say otherwise is wrong.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
106 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Thanks cali. I still am in awe of the consistantly thoughtful stream of postings you make here
Tom Rinaldo
Jan 2016
#4
Same here Tom. great stuff. And, Cali, some great posts and threads in the last few days as well.
emulatorloo
Jan 2016
#64
Hillary showing her true colors... only going to destroy what little credibility she has left.
InAbLuEsTaTe
Jan 2016
#6
One of the reasons the "Anyone but Hillary" contigent is so large in the first place is that
winter is coming
Jan 2016
#27
I disagree here, I agree Bernie has not gone negative however I feel Jeff Weaver has.
Agschmid
Jan 2016
#13
Weaver has only responded to the negative and awful attacks on Sanders from Hillary's campaign.
sabrina 1
Jan 2016
#70
Yes, they seem to think that bullying people is the way to go. I saw so many complaints on Social
sabrina 1
Jan 2016
#102
The House does not "always win." It did not win in 2008. It won't win in 2016.
Green Forest
Jan 2016
#11
You're entitled to your opinion but I disagree. I volunteered for Barack in Iowa beginning in Fall 2007
Green Forest
Jan 2016
#20
You decided who is "The House" in 2016 using blue links. I was there on the ground in Iowa in 2007.
Green Forest
Jan 2016
#49
"Obama had as much" establishment support "as Clinton" in fall 2007? I don't think so.
Green Forest
Jan 2016
#71
I hate bullshit moving of goalposts. You said, "the house always wins" which did not happen in 2008.
Green Forest
Jan 2016
#75
exactly!! The "house" backed Obama and abandoned Hillary though Obama's hardcore supporters
m-lekktor
Jan 2016
#22
Obama campaign official Samantha Power called Hillary a monster who will do anything to get
Bluenorthwest
Jan 2016
#88
Your first comment in this thread was a snotty little swipe at the OP lacking in any topicality
Bluenorthwest
Jan 2016
#91
If we've gotten to the point where Hillary Clinton is what the house is offering ......
raindaddy
Jan 2016
#41
Yes! It doesn't have to be Bernie, although Bernie is fantastic and will do just fine. Just offer
Ed Suspicious
Jan 2016
#50
she is making opposition to single-payer healthcare the establishment Democratic Party position
Douglas Carpenter
Jan 2016
#85
It's all about Hillary. Party interests and long term visions be damned. eom
Betty Karlson
Jan 2016
#105