2016 Postmortem

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)

9. If you are good enough, probably get more.

Reply to HerbChestnut (Reply #5)

Mon Jan 18, 2016, 12:40 AM

Jan 2016

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

73 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Bernie reminds everyone about the $600,000.00 Hillary got from Goldman Sachs for speeches!!! [View all] ViseGrip Jan 2016 OP

And got booed by the audience. Agschmid Jan 2016 #1

got booed... thomservo Jan 2016 #4

Probably a plant CoffeeCat Jan 2016 #51

Of course-any opposition to Sanders MUST be a plant, since no one could ever disagree with him ever! Empowerer Jan 2016 #58

the boo from that one lone soul retrowire Jan 2016 #26

That's what I thought too. JimDandy Jan 2016 #31

He was saying "Boo-ernie!" nxylas Jan 2016 #39

Well, that's definitely some spin. It could have been a banker that did it. stillwaiting Jan 2016 #49

Got booed....lol! Segami Jan 2016 #57

Getting money from speeches is different from politics, this was pay for her services. Thinkingabout Jan 2016 #2

LOL HerbChestnut Jan 2016 #5

If you are good enough, probably get more. Thinkingabout Jan 2016 #9

She's not that good. Fawke Em Jan 2016 #12

Yet quite a number athletes do that well or better. CajunBlazer Jan 2016 #18

"Oh, I forgot; that concept is foreign to socialists" - says an asshole Ned_Devine Jan 2016 #21

What we're really talking about is Late Stage Capitalism jhart3333 Jan 2016 #22

mayI salute you, Ned before someone alers you lol roguevalley Jan 2016 #24

good goin' Ned navarth Jan 2016 #33

This is the same poster who says it's fine for Carville to host a FUNDRAISER FOR TED CRUZ at his DisgustipatedinCA Jan 2016 #46

IF that were true Mark Grable Jan 2016 #34

A good import/export person can make millions! Babel_17 Jan 2016 #71

Nice Work When You Can Gettit... On the Other Hand... CorporatistNation Jan 2016 #7

Like the $18,000 contribution from NRA against an opponent? Thinkingabout Jan 2016 #13

That never happened? You know that's false information Lordquinton Jan 2016 #38

It is quiet true, we see on record of the votes Sanders made on gun issues, Thinkingabout Jan 2016 #52

"Services" "Not politics" ?? Really?? tokenlib Jan 2016 #8

Be serious angrychair Jan 2016 #11

Are you serious? 99th_Monkey Jan 2016 #17

Do you really believe that? Goldman Sachs also said they'd be happy with Hillary for prez. ViseGrip Jan 2016 #20

Let's let the public weigh in on that Kall Jan 2016 #29

Oh sure,...because she's a financial guru. Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2016 #40

Because Hillary is such a banking expert TheFarseer Jan 2016 #48

AKA 'Pay to Play'? sorechasm Jan 2016 #50

I think Bernie's point is that it was "pay for services". n/t winter is coming Jan 2016 #54

You're damn right it was payment for services. We call that corruption. DisgustipatedinCA Jan 2016 #65

That is the bottom line. azmom Jan 2016 #3

NBC debate, NBC poll released today, the Hillary cheering section, a total 'corporate shit show' ViseGrip Jan 2016 #6

Her History Tells The Tale Irrespective of What She Might Say Now in Order to Get CorporatistNation Jan 2016 #10

Goldman Sachs also said they'd be happy with a prez clinton. That won't work out well for us. ViseGrip Jan 2016 #14

Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Jan 2016 #15

Would anyone pay Bernie to give a speech? CajunBlazer Jan 2016 #16

No one on Wall Street ViseGrip Jan 2016 #19

Bernie wouldn't take it. it's called integrity roguevalley Jan 2016 #27

I read somewhere he gets $2,000 a speech, lob1 Jan 2016 #32

That's the Bernie Sanders I have watched for years now! ViseGrip Jan 2016 #61

He isn't a corrupt like that. DisgustipatedinCA Jan 2016 #47

So Bernie would be corrupt if he took money for a speech? CajunBlazer Jan 2016 #55

Not playing your game. I don't agree with Cruz supporters. DisgustipatedinCA Jan 2016 #56

Because you are losing the game treestar Jan 2016 #59

And I'm not playing your game for what should be obvious reasons. DisgustipatedinCA Jan 2016 #60

aren't those called legal bribes? tomm2thumbs Jan 2016 #23

But, Goldman Sachs expects nothing in return for their investments in her. Tierra_y_Libertad Jan 2016 #25

good for her. Lil Missy Jan 2016 #28

I doubt she'll get that after she loses. Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2016 #41

IF she loses, her and Bill will up their speaking fees! ViseGrip Jan 2016 #67

Are transcripts of the speeches available ??? SamKnause Jan 2016 #30

Some are, like her speech and ties to Monsanto - we need to get the message out, "GMO's are good!" ViseGrip Jan 2016 #62

Thank you for all the information. SamKnause Jan 2016 #66

He's also campaigning against Bill Clinton's penis jmowreader Jan 2016 #35

I guess there's only one way to settle this.... Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2016 #42

And I'm sure you can provide a link... ljm2002 Jan 2016 #53

Okay, how about this... jmowreader Jan 2016 #68

Miss the point much? ljm2002 Jan 2016 #70

Ok silenttigersong Jan 2016 #72

K&R. JDPriestly Jan 2016 #36

I attended a debate party. I knew only one of the other attendees before the party. JDPriestly Jan 2016 #37

Like it or not.... CajunBlazer Jan 2016 #69

Somebody has to do it. Unless someone dares to win without that dirty money, we will JDPriestly Jan 2016 #73

$600,000 from ONE Wall Street firm in ONE year ain't nuthin' merrily Jan 2016 #43

So what? Sanders is certainly not impugning her impartiality, he's not that kind of .....politician uponit7771 Jan 2016 #44

Bernie highlighted his skepticism that Hillary will bite the hand(s) that feed her. Green Forest Jan 2016 #45

But I am. You don't get six hundred thousand dollars from criminals for no reason. DisgustipatedinCA Jan 2016 #64

See response #62. More on Clinton speeches....just look at the Monsanto bullshit! ViseGrip Jan 2016 #63