Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
She's still Goldman Sachs favorite candidate, of course that doesn't bother you. JRLeft Jan 2016 #1
Has Bernie ever walked back his medical assertion...... Sheepshank Jan 2016 #3
This message was self-deleted by its author Armstead Jan 2016 #17
20 or more years ago? 2pooped2pop Jan 2016 #23
I've heard that Bernie is omnipotent Sheepshank Jan 2016 #48
:) Hillary "has the real-world experience and dedication Hortensis Jan 2016 #53
We know that Clinton is status quo 2pooped2pop Jan 2016 #85
The "we-know-what-we know" contingent? Hortensis Jan 2016 #89
I am really baffled that people aren't uncomfortable with Voice for Peace Jan 2016 #93
IMO we should worry about our OWN honesty first. Hortensis Jan 2016 #94
That's off topic though I agree Voice for Peace Jan 2016 #97
The members were not asked who they wanted 2pooped2pop Jan 2016 #96
Really desperate to try to use this 2pooped2pop Jan 2016 #87
Is that like how you guys keep using "Goldwater Girl" in so many posts? Yes, the hypocrisy synergie Jan 2016 #56
The one that was based on a report in a medical journal over 40 years ago? beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #31
So then one would assume technology aids in evolution of thought. Sheepshank Jan 2016 #50
New information? Do tell. I want to hear ALL about the NEW data on orgasms. beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #51
You first tell me that the Bernie medical report was 40 years ago Sheepshank Jan 2016 #54
You brought it up so obviously you must posess some sort of superior knowledge on the subject. beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #55
And every time I bring it up, I ask if Bernie has walked it back Sheepshank Jan 2016 #58
I want to hear more about this "Cervicam cancer". beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #61
You did not do Bernie any favors deflecting because of a typo Sheepshank Jan 2016 #65
I'm not here to do Bernie any favours, I'm here to learn. beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #69
Yeah...sure you are not here to promote Bernie Sheepshank Jan 2016 #73
You just said I was here to do him favours, make up your mind. beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #75
I asked first....did he walk it back? Nt Sheepshank Jan 2016 #78
You brought it up - repeatedly - so it's up to you to explain why he was wrong at the time. beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #82
Well first, you are the one that says I'm the expert...I'm 100% sure I never implied it. Sheepshank Jan 2016 #84
He GAVE medical advice? Really? Link to him advising women? beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #86
And your silly attack has jackshit to do with the op cali Jan 2016 #35
I was responding to a post, not the op. Insult to deflect. Not working. Nt Sheepshank Jan 2016 #49
Oh and it's cervical cancer, not "Cervicam". beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #59
Oooohhhh, typo makes you feel superior....pathetic. Nt Sheepshank Jan 2016 #60
Well you wanted to feel superior to Bernie and he at least got the terminology correct. beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #62
Even KKK gets their propoganda spelled correctly....what do think of their message? Nt Sheepshank Jan 2016 #68
So now Bernie is JUST like a white supremacist hate group because he spells words correctly? beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #72
You are the one that invoked typos as something that demolishes the message Sheepshank Jan 2016 #76
And you're the one who just compared a Jewish man to an anti-Semitic hate group. beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #79
You obsess about Bernie's Jewishness... Beating that drum every fucking chance you get Sheepshank Jan 2016 #99
Hey...you want to comment on this typo? Sheepshank Jan 2016 #98
Does that have to do with the issues retrowire Jan 2016 #74
Has much to do with leadership, respect and policy choices Sheepshank Jan 2016 #83
How does an amateur medical observation have to do with that? nt retrowire Jan 2016 #88
One ad hominem, countered with another Sheepshank Jan 2016 #100
They didn't poll their members about specific candidates. dogman Jan 2016 #2
OMG...so, that's how they can LIE about "polling" members. So, another hollow, shallow endorsement. in_cog_ni_to Jan 2016 #16
Great catch artislife Jan 2016 #63
lmao how SMART of them. smfh nt retrowire Jan 2016 #77
Union members supporting the Wall Street candidate isn't very SMART. Fawke Em Jan 2016 #4
If only those blue collar union workers were as smart as you Empowerer Jan 2016 #71
Good spellers.too SwampG8r Jan 2016 #90
Glad they polled members. I think most union leaders are in touch with members that elected them. Hoyt Jan 2016 #5
They didn't poll them on candidates. Fawke Em Jan 2016 #6
As I put in my post, Clinton fits their issues, "sorta" or definitely. Hoyt Jan 2016 #9
When did Clinton come out against TTP? Blue State Bandit Jan 2016 #37
Even in the wildest, most irrational fears of TPP, this unions' members will not be hurt, just Hoyt Jan 2016 #42
Not so sure they believe you. Blue State Bandit Jan 2016 #45
Don't believe it will hurt most, or any, jobs SMART represents. Maybe you can Hoyt Jan 2016 #47
which Clinton? which issues? which day? 2pooped2pop Jan 2016 #38
That was the interpretation from the higher ups. artislife Jan 2016 #64
"Higherups" got elected by members to represent their interests. Hoyt Jan 2016 #67
They did. artislife Jan 2016 #70
K&R mcar Jan 2016 #7
"The poll focused on issues, not candidates" PoliticAverse Jan 2016 #8
Well let's see. The union members probably have a good health plan, better wages than most, Hoyt Jan 2016 #12
You're kidding, right. Have you not been paying attention to the corporate imperative? Armstead Jan 2016 #29
That may be a bit misleading to say. Here's what they report they did. Wilms Jan 2016 #10
No they didn't poll members Nanjeanne Jan 2016 #11
Yes, they only polled the members on issues and then Executive Council decided like this... highprincipleswork Jan 2016 #95
Their General Executive council selected Clinton. Not members. Ash_F Jan 2016 #13
Ha! And their president was a 2008 delegate for Clinton Wilms Jan 2016 #21
Another union under the bus. sufrommich Jan 2016 #14
Based on the endorsement, Clinton got a whooping 16 people supporting her. snoringvoter Jan 2016 #19
16 WHOLE members of the board? Break out the champagne! beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #34
Funny how the "peoples choice" backers love throwing workinclasszero Jan 2016 #24
Did Hillary come out against TPP? Blue State Bandit Jan 2016 #41
Fail. Only Hillary supporting union bigwigs are being thrown cali Jan 2016 #36
*their Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2016 #15
Congratulations. Blue State Bandit Jan 2016 #18
These Clinton supporters are badly suffering from foot-in-mouth disease snoringvoter Jan 2016 #20
Same thing PP did....It's stated in a less than honest way Armstead Jan 2016 #25
It's all a game. This election is proving how big the battle is against power. JRLeft Jan 2016 #30
It is exactly! artislife Jan 2016 #66
OOPSIE! beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #33
Yay SMART!! workinclasszero Jan 2016 #22
Clinton & Sanders both addressed the Union Nanjeanne Jan 2016 #26
I do not support the endorsement of my union, I will Thinkingabout Jan 2016 #101
Not quite cali Jan 2016 #27
K&R. YEEESSSS! lunamagica Jan 2016 #28
Phony as hill. bigwig hilly supporting bigwigs making the decision cali Jan 2016 #39
They fucking well did not poll members on candidates. Fucking period cali Jan 2016 #32
Push polled... maybe. Blue State Bandit Jan 2016 #43
There, their, they're. Do you know the difference? hobbit709 Jan 2016 #40
Another dishonest post from a Clinton supporter. Why am I not Shocked? Motown_Johnny Jan 2016 #44
No, they did not poll their members. I know this firsthand. TwilightGardener Jan 2016 #46
Nice endorsement. Beacool Jan 2016 #52
I give up. What's SMART? Vinca Jan 2016 #57
Sheet Metal, Air, Rail, Transportation. TwilightGardener Jan 2016 #81
This OP has been proven false for over two hours catnhatnh Jan 2016 #80
K & R Iliyah Jan 2016 #91
Victim, much? Good lawd. libdem4life Jan 2016 #92
They did. I voted for Bernie in the poll. neverforget Jan 2016 #102
Actually as a union member I am much more concerned Thinkingabout Jan 2016 #103
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»SMART endorses Hillary Cl...»Reply #49