I'll take Rep. Lewis, Gwen Carr, Sybrina Fulton, Lucia McBath, Gabby Giffords, Dolores Hueta's (Reply #88)

In the discussion thread: Art Garfunkel Net Worth: 45 MILLION [View all]

Response to karynnj (Reply #55)

Sun Jan 24, 2016, 12:46 PM

lunamagica (9,967 posts)

88. I'll take Rep. Lewis, Gwen Carr, Sybrina Fulton, Lucia McBath, Gabby Giffords, Dolores Hueta's

Endorsements over anyone who endorses Sanders

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

177 replies	Author	Time	Post
Art Garfunkel Net Worth: 45 MILLION [View all]	boston bean	Jan 2016	OP
And his top supporters are uber-rich capitalists Ben and Jerry.	DanTex	Jan 2016	#1
I thought all successful people were evil oligarchs	redstateblues	Jan 2016	#4
You thought wrong. (n/t)	SMC22307	Jan 2016	#75
The point is that these rich guys are volunteering to pay more taxes....	Human101948	Jan 2016	#53
So are the wealthy people who support Hillary, since she is proposing to raise taxes on the wealthy.	DanTex	Jan 2016	#65
not the hedge fund people	Duckhunter935	Jan 2016	#78
Soros is a hedge fund person.	DanTex	Jan 2016	#80
let's see the speeches she gave	Duckhunter935	Jan 2016	#83
I'll put you down for "no evidence". Not surprising.	DanTex	Jan 2016	#84
I will not support	Duckhunter935	Jan 2016	#91
The problem is that Hillary only says she's going to	Unknown Beatle	Mar 2016	#177
Ihave a simile	hollysmom	Jan 2016	#69
Exactly. +1,000,000	Fast Walker 52	Jan 2016	#147
"Volunteering to pay more taxes". Not so much.	oasis	Jan 2016	#152
So, you're against ice cream	karynnj	Jan 2016	#70
Umm, I was being ironic. I like ice cream.	DanTex	Jan 2016	#71
You do understand the difference between Ben, Jerry and Jamie Dimond, don't you?	pangaia	Jan 2016	#114
Well, there are a lot of differences.	DanTex	Jan 2016	#118
you are gonna need a ladder to get out of that rabbit hole	questionseverything	Jan 2016	#129
There's also the difference that Ben and Jerry have never screwed over workers or entire countries	Ken Burch	Jan 2016	#131
It's funny that you call Dimon Hillary's "bff." Just another example of how detached Bernie	DanTex	Jan 2016	#134
And did so out of pure goodness.	Ken Burch	Jan 2016	#138
Of course, because supporting Bernie is an act of "pure goodness."	DanTex	Jan 2016	#139
It is.	Ken Burch	Jan 2016	#143
In your opinion. In Trump's opinion, supporting Trump is an act of pure goodness.	DanTex	Jan 2016	#149
Trust me..	pangaia	Jan 2016	#87
Oh no! The Evil Ben and Jerry...I thiught Bernie was a commie who hates success	Armstead	Jan 2016	#97
I think the term is "champagne socialist".	DanTex	Jan 2016	#99
I think the term is successful people who are also decent human beings	Armstead	Jan 2016	#102
So it's OK as long as they support Bernie.	DanTex	Jan 2016	#104
Your usual bullshit	Armstead	Jan 2016	#106
Seems to be the yardstick when it comes to HRC supporters. Or Hillary herself, for that	DanTex	Jan 2016	#107
Hillary is a decent human being	Armstead	Jan 2016	#111
It's different if you support a candidate who backs the people instead of the rich.	Ken Burch	Jan 2016	#117
You're talking about the GOP. Both Hillary and Bernie back the people.	DanTex	Jan 2016	#119
Why are you so obsessed with rehabbing rich folks who back HRC?	Ken Burch	Jan 2016	#121
Just pointing out hypocrisy.	DanTex	Jan 2016	#123
There is no hypocrisy.	Ken Burch	Jan 2016	#125
Of course there is. Rich people who don't back Bernie get bashed, rich people who back Bernie	DanTex	Jan 2016	#132
It's different when a rich person puts their self-interest second.	Ken Burch	Jan 2016	#126
if you are rich and support hc	questionseverything	Jan 2016	#133
Quite the opposite. Supporting Hillary means improving the healthcare system,	DanTex	Jan 2016	#136
the aca was pretty much exactly what hc campaigned on in 08	questionseverything	Jan 2016	#156
If I won a lottery worth $200 million dollars, would I be	SamKnause	Jan 2016	#2
hmmmmmm.... I know all the millionaires who support Bernie are just different	boston bean	Jan 2016	#3
Hi.	SamKnause	Jan 2016	#9
Art Garfunkel didn't win the lottery.. Why are you asking me this?	boston bean	Jan 2016	#10
I want you to clarify what part of the establishment means to you.	SamKnause	Jan 2016	#16
Well, I guess I would need to know yours, cause everyone else but bernies millionaires seem to fall	boston bean	Jan 2016	#21
If you have political clout because of your wealth.	SamKnause	Jan 2016	#26
They are just the evil 1% enabling the establishment to keep screwing us over, right?	boston bean	Jan 2016	#28
wealthy people DO have political clout	hfojvt	Jan 2016	#154
Getting rich as a musician isn't the same as getting rich by exploiting people.	Ken Burch	Jan 2016	#124
yes, they become part of the establishment over time.	MariaThinks	Jan 2016	#94
Any idea what those ratio's are?	MrMickeysMom	Jan 2016	#62
I would just say...	quickesst	Jan 2016	#8
You think lottery winners have access	SamKnause	Jan 2016	#13
Really?	quickesst	Jan 2016	#66
I guess I am naive.	SamKnause	Jan 2016	#74
I don't think you're the oddball out...	quickesst	Jan 2016	#158
What does that have to do with the OP?	mcar	Jan 2016	#11
They must have come up with this new meme at their morning meeting.	notadmblnd	Jan 2016	#31
This is what the newspaper looks like in the bottom of the bird cage. nt	artislife	Jan 2016	#145
Sigh. You are misinformed, uninformed or playing games.	cali	Jan 2016	#5
And here I thought I was talking the right lingo! nt	boston bean	Jan 2016	#6
Lingo? Lol.	cali	Jan 2016	#17
slingo???	boston bean	Jan 2016	#19
Okay, now you seem intent on embarrassing yourself. Go to it.	cali	Jan 2016	#23
Thanks for your permission.. nt	boston bean	Jan 2016	#24
:-) Well said.	riversedge	Jan 2016	#27
Always. nt.	polly7	Jan 2016	#48
All three, actually.	Wilms	Jan 2016	#7
Message auto-removed	Name removed	Jan 2016	#12
Hello ~ Stoolbend	In_The_Wind	Jan 2016	#108
Yep.	RiverLover	Jan 2016	#18
Coo coo ca choo Mrs Robinson	Fumesucker	Jan 2016	#14
Art Garfunkel = the establishment?	beam me up scottie	Jan 2016	#15
They don't want to know the difference, scottie...	MrMickeysMom	Jan 2016	#54
Definitions mean nothing, it's truly bizarre.	beam me up scottie	Jan 2016	#56
Being in Congress for how many years? Having your family work for you? Having your wife benefit?	KittyWampus	Jan 2016	#60
LMAO! I rest my case!	beam me up scottie	Jan 2016	#63
........	polly7	Jan 2016	#73
#berniesotablishment he does his own laundry!	beam me up scottie	Jan 2016	#76
They really don't have anything at all compelling against him, do they?	polly7	Jan 2016	#81
Nope, that's why they have to manufacture smears.	beam me up scottie	Jan 2016	#85
OK. Got it. Successful people who support HRC-Evil	redstateblues	Jan 2016	#159
This is what you've actually "got":	beam me up scottie	Jan 2016	#160
..........	boston bean	Jan 2016	#77
Not like S&G run Bechtel Corp. or sell Junk Bonds. This meme is insipid	leveymg	Jan 2016	#20
This message was self-deleted by its author	leveymg	Jan 2016	#22
deserves twice that for serving up the soundtrack of this campaign	reddread	Jan 2016	#25
Such a beautiful song...	SMC22307	Jan 2016	#86
$45 M delivers the 1%'s newspapers and shines their shoes	underpants	Jan 2016	#29
$45M does that, huh? Are they hiring?	DanTex	Jan 2016	#68
This may not be the stupidest post I've ever seen but it's right up there	tularetom	Jan 2016	#30
I know... How could have I ever come to that conclusion! LOL	boston bean	Jan 2016	#32
Seriously.	polly7	Jan 2016	#89
Despicable IGNORE - nt	KingCharlemagne	Jan 2016	#33
He's got a ways to go before matching Hillbot $200M Katy Perry.	closeupready	Jan 2016	#34
Thanks for this! LOL	boston bean	Jan 2016	#35
Well that's just poor compared to the Clintons.	ViseGrip	Jan 2016	#36
Ignorance is forgivable	elias49	Jan 2016	#37
You're right! nt	boston bean	Jan 2016	#38
And to think we all fought Bush together.	Gregorian	Jan 2016	#39
Sniff. Is that smell desparation?	Fawke Em	Jan 2016	#40
I love the smell of flop sweat in the morning	Fumesucker	Jan 2016	#120
LOL	Fast Walker 52	Jan 2016	#150
Oh, you didn't go there!	ucrdem	Jan 2016	#41
This is another demonstration of someone who has never listened...	MrMickeysMom	Jan 2016	#42
Art should give up 44 M of those earnings in taxes, is that what you are saying?	boston bean	Jan 2016	#43
Art should give $44 million to Hillary then?	elias49	Jan 2016	#45
Why would you think I said THAT?	MrMickeysMom	Jan 2016	#46
Is Art a member of the 1%?	boston bean	Jan 2016	#50
I don't think she gets it.	polly7	Jan 2016	#72
I don't either, polly....	MrMickeysMom	Jan 2016	#101
You're a good soul.	polly7	Jan 2016	#105
Thanks, polly!	MrMickeysMom	Jan 2016	#110
I could never serve as you did in any political or community leader position.	polly7	Jan 2016	#122
Bernie is not against people making money, its about fairness. trash this tread is an easy one	litlbilly	Jan 2016	#44
I'm about to do that, based on the ridiculous nature of arguments from these posters...	MrMickeysMom	Jan 2016	#47
I hear ya. It just shows their desperation, they got nothing.	litlbilly	Jan 2016	#51
Actually, they DO....	MrMickeysMom	Jan 2016	#57
He should only be licensing music from starving artists	KingFlorez	Jan 2016	#49
"Fools" said I, "you do not know, Silence like a cancer grows"	Sunlei	Jan 2016	#52
This is ridiculous	karynnj	Jan 2016	#55
Actually, not sad at all.	boston bean	Jan 2016	#58
I'll take Rep. Lewis, Gwen Carr, Sybrina Fulton, Lucia McBath, Gabby Giffords, Dolores Hueta's	lunamagica	Jan 2016	#88
If you do not understand the difference between Art Garfunkel and Jamie Dimon,	pangaia	Jan 2016	#59
^^^^^^	Duckhunter935	Jan 2016	#79
+100	Armstead	Jan 2016	#100
He earned it honestly with his own hard work and talent. What's the problem? nt.	polly7	Jan 2016	#61
+1 (NT)	Eric J in MN	Jan 2016	#64
Stupid post. Here's what I think about that...	ChisolmTrailDem	Jan 2016	#67
What a crock. Fail. Wealth does not disqualify one for agreeing that there is income	libdem4life	Jan 2016	#82
SUCK OF THE DAY!	Ron Green	Jan 2016	#90
That's what he said.	demmiblue	Jan 2016	#96
Thanks for posting	Gothmog	Jan 2016	#92
Is he trying to get corporate or billionaire welfare, etc.? No of course not.n/t	Skwmom	Jan 2016	#93
Paul Simon gives back in a very big real way	karynnj	Jan 2016	#95
Your distortions are astounding sometimes	Armstead	Jan 2016	#98
This is dumbest thing I've ever read	whatchamacallit	Jan 2016	#103
You know, I'm getting very tired of Clinton supporters assuming we are complete morons.	jeff47	Jan 2016	#109
I'm actually coming to enjoy the desperation they exhibit	Fumesucker	Jan 2016	#142
I couldn't have said it	Aerows	Jan 2016	#164
+1	SixString	Jan 2016	#170
So now we're throwing Artie under the bus?	Ken Burch	Jan 2016	#112
I guess this means tha Bernie is even making head roads into the top 1%	awake	Jan 2016	#113
Before Sanders' "America" ad, did you even know who Art Garfunkel was?	SMC22307	Jan 2016	#115
DU rec...nt	SidDithers	Jan 2016	#116
Bernie's distortions that all rich people are bad has come back to bite him.	Dawson Leery	Jan 2016	#127
Put up or......	cali	Jan 2016	#130
What a crock. Did you get that POS talking point in your daily email? nt.	polly7	Jan 2016	#135
No, the distortions you express are right wing nonsense	Armstead	Jan 2016	#137
You do know that people in the poorest countries	RoccoR5955	Jan 2016	#141
Man, some of you Hillbots are losing your fucking shit spectacularly.	CBGLuthier	Jan 2016	#128
^^^This.	artislife	Jan 2016	#148
Wait until Hillary loses a couple of actual primaries	Fumesucker	Jan 2016	#162
Message auto-removed	Name removed	Jan 2016	#140
Sunday morning funnies?	artislife	Jan 2016	#144
identical to right wing attacks	Roy Ellefson	Jan 2016	#146
Wow no wonder he is a Bernie supporter!	workinclasszero	Jan 2016	#151
Remember "The Mummy" when the scientist goes mad and laughs	closeupready	Jan 2016	#153
Just Wow	Nanjeanne	Jan 2016	#155
Oh it is silly season for sure. Newsflash Boston Bean, Simon & Garfunkle ain't Goldman Sachs	bklyncowgirl	Jan 2016	#157
Paul Simon is worth considerably more, why go after Art?	Juicy_Bellows	Jan 2016	#161
LMAO! This is hilarious!	R B Garr	Jan 2016	#163
This is better than any comedy routine.	Bonobo	Jan 2016	#165
LOL! Is the latest: smearing Art Garfunkell???	Bernblu	Jan 2016	#166
SIMON AND GARFUNKEL GO UNDER THE BUS!	beam me up scottie	Jan 2016	#169
THAT'S NOT AT ALL WHAT THIS IS SAYING	R B Garr	Jan 2016	#176
Demi Lovato net worth: 20 Million	Warren DeMontague	Jan 2016	#167
45 million isn't one percent.	Jesus Malverde	Jan 2016	#168
I think that moniker for the billionaires has a %# at less than .001	nolabels	Jan 2016	#171
Some families are worth trillions.	Jesus Malverde	Jan 2016	#173
Well maybe you might get some scared enough to run from it but that does not solve the problem	nolabels	Jan 2016	#175
It's true. Garfunkel has special access to the Sanders campaign...	Orsino	Jan 2016	#172
The Clinton's net worth - $111 million	wavesofeuphoria	Jan 2016	#174

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.