Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

JackRiddler

(24,979 posts)

1. Good luck being sober in this milieu!

Reply to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Sun Jan 24, 2016, 04:19 PM

Jan 2016

What did David Brock say today? How communist atheist is Sanders anyway? Clinton speaks to Goldman Sachs for charity! Vote for her or you are sexist, racist and stupid! Why do you hate Obama? You're supporting Trump!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

15 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Why does Clinton do better in some polls and Sanders in others? House effect and bad methodology. [View all] Attorney in Texas Jan 2016 OP

Good luck being sober in this milieu! JackRiddler Jan 2016 #1

I'm ever optimistic Attorney in Texas Jan 2016 #6

Bad methodologies are features not bugs in our political system. stillwaiting Jan 2016 #2

Nate Silverman says HRC leads in IA and NH Gman Jan 2016 #3

You sure dont. You might want to actually look at what Nate says now. litlbilly Jan 2016 #4

First, you're incorrect. 1. His name is Nate Silver. 2. He projects Sanders as winning New Hampshire Attorney in Texas Jan 2016 #5

He knows what his name is. Gman Jan 2016 #9

Updated yesterday. Gman Jan 2016 #10

Your suggestion that Silver projects Clinton to win NH is still wrong (Sanders is the 86% or 61% Attorney in Texas Jan 2016 #11

I think the HRC folks really don't expect to win NH Gman Jan 2016 #12

OR... or... Sanders is behind? uponit7771 Jan 2016 #7

That's possible, but... JackRiddler Jan 2016 #8

Either you think the live landline + cell phone polls are right or the robo-call polls are right. We Attorney in Texas Jan 2016 #15

If you want to eliminate "house effect" and other poll problems..... CajunBlazer Jan 2016 #13

Wrong. That does not eliminate house effect (it masks it). The Real Clear Politics aggregation Attorney in Texas Jan 2016 #14