Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

SheenaR

(2,052 posts)

11. Yes

Reply to workinclasszero (Reply #7)

Sat Jan 30, 2016, 08:26 PM

Jan 2016

You got me. At least I know how MOE works. Hill could be up by as many as 11 and Bernie can be up by as much as 5.
It's a better result PR wise for HRC but the boasting everywhere is a bit premature.

Boast away if you win Monday.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

16 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Info for the math challenged... [View all] workinclasszero Jan 2016 OP

It is +/- 4% so it's a statistical tie Jarqui Jan 2016 #1

MOE eom MrChuck Jan 2016 #2

You might work on some math saltpoint Jan 2016 #3

Oh sure if it was Bernie ahead by 3% workinclasszero Jan 2016 #4

No SheenaR Jan 2016 #6

No fucking way. First of all, dear zero, I've said repeatedly cali Jan 2016 #16

Lol SheenaR Jan 2016 #5

Aww sour grapes workinclasszero Jan 2016 #7

Yes SheenaR Jan 2016 #11

55% ANTI-Hillary vote. basselope Jan 2016 #8

58% ANTI-Sanders vote. Metric System Jan 2016 #10

No such thing. basselope Jan 2016 #12

+85% of caucus goers committed to Hillary, 69% to Sanders BigGLiberal Jan 2016 #13

As I said in the last post about this poll mythology Jan 2016 #9

We're should use terminology that Bernie's fans can relate to: HILLARY IS SURGING!! NurseJackie Jan 2016 #14

HILLARY IS SURGING!! workinclasszero Jan 2016 #15