Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Good for her. Don't feed the trolls. DanTex Feb 2016 #1
LOL. You're funny. R. Daneel Olivaw Feb 2016 #2
Since when is wanting a candidates position with Wall Street "trolling"? MrMickeysMom Feb 2016 #15
Trolling on DU as defined since 2008 = Posts that don't toe the line. nt MadDAsHell Feb 2016 #129
I think you mis-spelled "voters." appal_jack Feb 2016 #21
This won't go away. cali Feb 2016 #33
Possibly. R. Daneel Olivaw Feb 2016 #45
probably exactly as bad as we imagine,but it won't go away until she releases it,and she won't virtualobserver Feb 2016 #57
Of course the speculation is worse. Have you been to any of these corporate event things? DanTex Feb 2016 #82
So why do they pay her $250,000 for a boring speech no one listens to? Bread and Circus Feb 2016 #95
Cause that's what they offered... R. Daneel Olivaw Feb 2016 #100
It's called quid pro quo Plucketeer Feb 2016 #110
it is not considered a gift Marty McGraw Feb 2016 #139
If she doesn't release them now, her wall street problems cali Feb 2016 #102
I agree. MrChuck Feb 2016 #90
I doubt that Clinton would be so unwise as to publicly say things ladjf Feb 2016 #177
Getting close to that line Dan.. Getting awful close. notadmblnd Feb 2016 #63
some are more equal Duckhunter935 Feb 2016 #68
We just can't demand... Bohemianwriter Feb 2016 #80
I agree...n/t asuhornets Feb 2016 #147
Do you know ? TubbersUK Feb 2016 #3
Everybody that has had similar speaking engagements AFAIK. R. Daneel Olivaw Feb 2016 #6
Thanks :) TubbersUK Feb 2016 #7
I'm not sure who "those politicians" are. R. Daneel Olivaw Feb 2016 #10
Yes, sounds like a pretty moveable feast n/t TubbersUK Feb 2016 #17
I was wondering how she'd get around this. Now I know. Duval Feb 2016 #94
Bill's juxtaposed Feb 2016 #14
I'm shocked UglyGreed Feb 2016 #4
O, what a tangled web we weave... chervilant Feb 2016 #5
No better way to say guilty. Thanks Hillary 2pooped2pop Feb 2016 #8
She's smart not to let her enemies pick apart her every word and oasis Feb 2016 #9
Or perhaps she knows it would end her campaign if R. Daneel Olivaw Feb 2016 #12
There is no upside in releasing them. She knows voters oasis Feb 2016 #30
Yes there is. It makes a lot of her wall street/financial industry cali Feb 2016 #36
Apparently, she's not going to cooperate in helping her enemies oasis Feb 2016 #71
No, it will not go away, imo..the speeches are not likely going to be riddled with Jefferson23 Feb 2016 #83
She's Asking The Voters For Their Vote - Don't You Think That The Voters Have A Right To Know If.... global1 Feb 2016 #47
Hillary will be judged on her overall record. She's overcome oasis Feb 2016 #65
She's overcome nothing Got it Feb 2016 #118
And that's what we're doing. Judging her overall record. frylock Feb 2016 #151
Like she did in 2008 Goblinmonger Feb 2016 #183
Important issues like regulation of Wall Street banks? jalan48 Feb 2016 #50
Hillary vs. GOP. Get it? oasis Feb 2016 #54
Not really. It's Hillary with the big banks vs. the people. jalan48 Feb 2016 #62
It may not be the answer you want, but Hill will let the oasis Feb 2016 #79
That's her mistake. Teams that look ahead to the "big game" usually lose. jalan48 Feb 2016 #88
The GOP vs. the Clinton Machine. Bring it on. oasis Feb 2016 #113
And the Wall Street Bankers go crazy with applause. jalan48 Feb 2016 #132
Newsflash: Not everyone in America is Wall Street obsessed. oasis Feb 2016 #134
Go Goldman Sachs go! Rah! Rah! jalan48 Feb 2016 #135
Respectfully disagree. H2O Man Feb 2016 #76
To be sure, Hillary's campaign has already weighed the pros and cons. oasis Feb 2016 #86
Yes, Hillary certainly seems to have crossed the Rubicon. Of course, you realize the inappropriate xocet Feb 2016 #148
An appropriate metaphor for Hillary's overcoming the many oasis Feb 2016 #174
Your reference is to Shakespeare's Richard III; specifically, to the dialog right before Richard III xocet Feb 2016 #180
Little tip for you. Don't quote Shakespeare Goblinmonger Feb 2016 #185
Right. H2O Man Feb 2016 #171
She's boxed in. It's a no win situation, regardless of what she does. antigop Feb 2016 #140
More important Old Codger Feb 2016 #92
Hillary chooses privacy. Let the chips fall where they may. oasis Feb 2016 #108
They will Old Codger Feb 2016 #117
"Hillary chooses privacy." malokvale77 Feb 2016 #153
Let her choose privacy and go away. frylock Feb 2016 #154
Yes, she's real smart for not disclosing the truth... MrMickeysMom Feb 2016 #20
The "truth" can be distorted, as you well know. nt oasis Feb 2016 #31
Then it wouldn't be true, would it? MrMickeysMom Feb 2016 #41
These days it's called "spin". Many here are familiar with the tactic. nt oasis Feb 2016 #51
Dem party voters are her potential enemies? Hydra Feb 2016 #161
Yep catnhatnh Feb 2016 #166
Everyone else is not running for president. RDANGELO Feb 2016 #11
I'm not sure if She was referring to Bernie or the republicans, R. Daneel Olivaw Feb 2016 #18
SHE DOESN'T WANT MAIN STREET TO SEE WHAT SHE SAID TO WALL STREET! MrMickeysMom Feb 2016 #23
She is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Goldman-Sachs... Yurovsky Feb 2016 #13
Hey, a big round of applause for her supporters being okay with THAT! MrMickeysMom Feb 2016 #26
I'm sure Bernie would release his speech transcripts. HooptieWagon Feb 2016 #16
Transcripts would be easy for Sanders mikehiggins Feb 2016 #43
What a great candidate for the average American!! stillwaiting Feb 2016 #19
That was another gift to Bernie Sanders INdemo Feb 2016 #22
If everybody else does? Erich Bloodaxe BSN Feb 2016 #24
I'm sure Bernie would be delighted to release transcripts... Ino Feb 2016 #29
I'm quoting the first few pages from one of his most comprehensive speeches at Georgetown Univ... MrMickeysMom Feb 2016 #38
This speach should be inserted into every negative Bernie thread StandingInLeftField Feb 2016 #141
No Transcripts of Bank Speeches, No Iowa Audit NowSam Feb 2016 #25
Maybe she'll release them if we paid her $225,000 per speech Blus4u Feb 2016 #69
LOL NowSam Feb 2016 #70
Maybe she'll respond to a GoFundme think4yourself Feb 2016 #75
Stop with the immature Republican-style naming of things. Bernie would not approve. ancianita Feb 2016 #27
These were her words. R. Daneel Olivaw Feb 2016 #35
I'm referring to YOU calling HER "Hillarity." We can knock off the Repub-style cheap shots ancianita Feb 2016 #42
When she starts acting like a candidate I can respect R. Daneel Olivaw Feb 2016 #44
Snap. n/t sarge43 Feb 2016 #85
Naw, you need to show some respect toward your party's campaign style if you ancianita Feb 2016 #111
I'm a socialist. R. Daneel Olivaw Feb 2016 #167
Like the guy Old Codger Feb 2016 #97
COVER UP! If you have nothing to hide, release them. She obviously said things that corroborates in_cog_ni_to Feb 2016 #28
Taking Old Codger Feb 2016 #103
Yes she is! We're not as stupid as she thinks we are. in_cog_ni_to Feb 2016 #106
We KNEW she wouldn't. It would destroy her. Bonobo Feb 2016 #32
Then she just shot herself in the foot. Repetitive lies make one a liar. californiabernin Feb 2016 #34
Smart move... BklnDem75 Feb 2016 #37
There's a bit of a flaw in your argument... ljm2002 Feb 2016 #121
I just don't see it... BklnDem75 Feb 2016 #168
Having got their opponent to dig in her heels it's now time for people stalking the story HereSince1628 Feb 2016 #39
On CNN this morning she was setting the record straight on what Elizabeth Warren bkkyosemite Feb 2016 #40
Warren's own book "A Fighting Chance" admits that reality. joshcryer Feb 2016 #59
Stop making sense! Metric System Feb 2016 #158
Seriously, why doesn't someone put up a wanted ad and ask for a bootleg copy of the speech? Baitball Blogger Feb 2016 #46
Nixon responds Ichingcarpenter Feb 2016 #48
!!! H2O Man Feb 2016 #60
Great compilation. Kudos. farleftlib Feb 2016 #127
Nothing like transparency EndElectoral Feb 2016 #49
As soon as Bernie releases his Goldman Sachs speach transcripts then Hillary will, Oh, wait litlbilly Feb 2016 #52
Bernie already released his Goldman Sachs speech transcript. Gary 50 Feb 2016 #130
I saw that, it was funny:) litlbilly Feb 2016 #137
Great idea Hillary!!! 99Forever Feb 2016 #53
But we already knew that, didn't we? notadmblnd Feb 2016 #55
Good for her. stonecutter357 Feb 2016 #56
That was not a good appearance Mnpaul Feb 2016 #58
Unforced error. H2O Man Feb 2016 #61
^ Nailed it. nt TBF Feb 2016 #64
She could have avoided all this zalinda Feb 2016 #66
This message was self-deleted by its author BlandGrenade Feb 2016 #78
unlike her Bernie Duckhunter935 Feb 2016 #124
Came to say this. krispos42 Feb 2016 #159
Good! leftofcool Feb 2016 #67
She can't release them localroger Feb 2016 #72
Good luck with this strategy. Fearless Feb 2016 #73
A candidate running from her word Android3.14 Feb 2016 #74
I am SHOCKED I tell you, SHOCKED!!! debunction.junction Feb 2016 #77
Who is everybody else? Bernie is the only one running in the primary with her. Jefferson23 Feb 2016 #81
Yep. R. Daneel Olivaw Feb 2016 #122
Makes perfect sense to me BlandGrenade Feb 2016 #84
You peasants only need to know what we want you to know! JoeyT Feb 2016 #87
The only thing worse for her would be to release LibDemAlways Feb 2016 #89
Hillary Told George Stephanopoulos She Will Release Transcripts on One Small Condition gordyfl Feb 2016 #91
I saw that Duckhunter935 Feb 2016 #125
How many of those people are running for President, Hillary? ljm2002 Feb 2016 #128
I wonder which DUer she borrowed that argument from?! frylock Feb 2016 #156
Who does she mean by "everybody else?" gyroscope Feb 2016 #93
Of course she won't release the transcripts.... TxGrandpa Feb 2016 #96
and she wonders why people don't trust her? dana_b Feb 2016 #98
I believe the speeches were totally innocuous, and that's the problem. hedgehog Feb 2016 #99
That's it right there. People will ask "They paid you how much for this crap?" backscatter712 Feb 2016 #107
Yep, wink wink transactions. Why would any politician allow themselves to be Jefferson23 Feb 2016 #115
I am sure that nothing is there. Floridanow Feb 2016 #164
Clinton is on Face the Nation going out on a limb trying to slam Sanders all the while Jefferson23 Feb 2016 #101
Hillary declines to provide information vital to assessing her relationship with Wall Street whatchamacallit Feb 2016 #104
Hill ain't going to release shit madokie Feb 2016 #105
I will place my bet on the Bronco's for the win by 3+ nolabels Feb 2016 #143
You would have to believe WS gives money because they're just stupid, and Jefferson23 Feb 2016 #109
This is exactly EdwardBernays Feb 2016 #112
What an amateur move shawn703 Feb 2016 #114
I agree. Floridanow Feb 2016 #162
she can't.... yourout Feb 2016 #116
In other words: she really is a Wall Street shill. Thanks for the notice. eom Betty Karlson Feb 2016 #119
Ha! I was right! nt SusanCalvin Feb 2016 #120
Watching her duck, dive Faux pas Feb 2016 #123
Big surprise! polichick Feb 2016 #126
I more or less predicted as much less than 12 hours ago. Go figure. nt silvershadow Feb 2016 #131
She does NOT want voters to know what she said... SoapBox Feb 2016 #133
She must have something to hide. We do have the 5th amendment Dragonfli Feb 2016 #136
LINK TO VIDEO antigop Feb 2016 #138
What kind of a response is that? Sounds like a kid LibDemAlways Feb 2016 #150
as I mentioned upthread. She's boxed in...regardless of what she does. antigop Feb 2016 #152
Then she should just release the damned Floridanow Feb 2016 #165
Wow - her sucking up to Wall Street must be worse than we suspected. Vinca Feb 2016 #142
These speeches raise two questions DaveT Feb 2016 #144
She can have seat next to Romney and his taxes. Spitfire of ATJ Feb 2016 #145
GOOD!!! asuhornets Feb 2016 #146
That strategy didn't work so well for Nixon either Major Nikon Feb 2016 #149
These speeches were probably not that sadoldgirl Feb 2016 #155
Hillarity? Metric System Feb 2016 #157
Fallacious thinking 21st Century Poet Feb 2016 #160
How did the Dems get here???? Dems to Win Feb 2016 #163
I hope you will reconsider using "Hillarity". No matter what you think about Hillary, we should be cui bono Feb 2016 #169
How about "Clintoon?" R. Daneel Olivaw Feb 2016 #170
No matter what you think of her, your behavior reflects on you. cui bono Feb 2016 #172
I don't fekkin care. R. Daneel Olivaw Feb 2016 #173
There's plenty of policy to mock her about and criticize her for. cui bono Feb 2016 #175
Try rereading my earlier reply, and if somebody is going to make their opinion R. Daneel Olivaw Feb 2016 #179
She's a crippled candidate with the email thing and Goldman speech hanging over her head LittleBlue Feb 2016 #176
Excellent...n/t asuhornets Feb 2016 #178
Why is it that Hillary must release the transcripts but it's okay if all the other candidates don't? kstewart33 Feb 2016 #181
It's a convenient parry by Hillary. R. Daneel Olivaw Feb 2016 #182
Hillarity??? Beacool Feb 2016 #184
Yes. Hilarity. She gives me a lot to laugh about R. Daneel Olivaw Feb 2016 #186
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hillarity says she won't ...»Reply #73