Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
And also that the moon landing was faked. Don't leave that one out. DanTex Feb 2016 #1
Don't be so proud to think that vote fraud doesn't happen in America. Or that only Repugs do it. reformist2 Feb 2016 #2
It was probably the same people that faked the moon landing who rigged the Iowa caucus. DanTex Feb 2016 #3
Yes because the elections are never rigged are they? 2pooped2pop Feb 2016 #6
I guess maybe Bernie rigged it and came up a little short, but it seems like a stretch. Maybe DanTex Feb 2016 #8
Hmmm so he rigged it so he would lose votes to Clinton? 2pooped2pop Feb 2016 #9
Well, nobody accuses Bernie of being able to actually accomplish things.... DanTex Feb 2016 #31
Again silly response. We should probably just stop here. 2pooped2pop Feb 2016 #32
Well, the entire discussion about Iowa being rigged is silly. DanTex Feb 2016 #36
Donald Trump believes it SCantiGOP Feb 2016 #41
We don't believe Iowa was rigged. MrChuck Feb 2016 #90
Yeah, I'm sure there were rookie mistakes in such a chaotic system. DanTex Feb 2016 #96
Come on Dan... MrChuck Feb 2016 #103
Lots of books on human nature, huh? Did those books only apply to people caucusing for Hillary? DanTex Feb 2016 #115
I'm going to ignore the fact that you have twisted my words regarding the books that I've read MrChuck Feb 2016 #124
Well, I saw one video of an enraged Bernie supporter trying to bully the guy running a caucus. DanTex Feb 2016 #130
I recall reading it was a 45 Minute holdup of the vote. n/t Matt_R Feb 2016 #196
DanTex believe me when I say Mbrow Feb 2016 #134
I'd like to think your attitude isn't prevalent among our populace Plucketeer Feb 2016 #110
Why would anybody be "desperate"? treestar Feb 2016 #203
That's probably why it's major newspaper came out and pretty much said the same thing. libdem4life Feb 2016 #156
It's only silly if you are in the tank for Clinton no matter what. totodeinhere Feb 2016 #172
Why is it silly? We know of some irregularities. And we know that the Oligarchy that you rhett o rick Feb 2016 #211
Sometimes, it's best to try and not force the last word when one is flailing. TheBlackAdder Feb 2016 #54
You can't be...not in the day and age. DanTex knows better... but is being disingenous. Bubzer Feb 2016 #94
Disingenuous... I call it flailing. I think they've seen the writing on the wall. cherokeeprogressive Feb 2016 #190
Honestly, I'd rather not. I already have a low opinon of a number of her supporters... Bubzer Feb 2016 #191
It was probably the driver with the HRC license plate on her car. bkkyosemite Feb 2016 #46
Related link CentralMass Feb 2016 #56
OJ Simpson greiner3 Feb 2016 #141
Got any better strawmen? Bohemianwriter Feb 2016 #214
Debbie has lots of Republican friends. Maybe they sent her a how-to-rig-elections book. Betty Karlson Feb 2016 #121
To equate someone who questions the vote integrity to a conspiracy nut NowSam Feb 2016 #18
The Desmoines Register realizes what is at stake for Iowa. A Simple Game Feb 2016 #35
I think that, as well. It should be a state without weather issues, sizeable enough to warrant the libdem4life Feb 2016 #178
You're not going to get any serious answers from that poster notadmblnd Feb 2016 #60
Thanks. NowSam Feb 2016 #70
That poster knows the writing is on the wall. frylock Feb 2016 #137
Have you ever heard a person who has just died- last breath come out of them? notadmblnd Feb 2016 #152
Making stuff up without real evidence. .. Cary Feb 2016 #199
We just want a fair election NowSam Feb 2016 #200
Smearing people is fair? Cary Feb 2016 #206
Andi McGuire releasing the actual votes NowSam Feb 2016 #207
Thank you. Matariki Feb 2016 #201
I live in Iowa and we are dealing with these discrepancies CoffeeCat Feb 2016 #55
I think it's great. Conspiracy theories about Iowa do nothing but make Bernie supporters appear out DanTex Feb 2016 #61
You're hilarious! CoffeeCat Feb 2016 #68
He's a frustrated and angry poster... MrMickeysMom Feb 2016 #101
Exactly. senz Feb 2016 #170
You mean Dan Tex? He never comes across as angry at all. treestar Feb 2016 #204
It doesn't become him, either... MrMickeysMom Feb 2016 #205
I guess that's all you got left now that Hillary is shown to be vulnerable. Perogie Feb 2016 #84
You're really embarrassing yourself. kath Feb 2016 #111
"All errors found have favored Clinton." Thor_MN Feb 2016 #126
Haha - moon landing. OhZone Feb 2016 #69
My goodness. senz Feb 2016 #174
Please direct us to the Des Moines Register article... ljm2002 Feb 2016 #81
Ya know, I like that you compare Bernie's accomplishment to the Space Race Android3.14 Feb 2016 #82
Ah, that was a knee jerk reply. Lots of snark, you think? cannabis_flower Feb 2016 #83
This is way down line from the original DanTex cute-ism, but it sure seems that his TryLogic Feb 2016 #100
Your An Idiot! Chasstev365 Feb 2016 #114
We need a technical term for what you did here. zeemike Feb 2016 #127
I believe the term is "joking." DanTex Feb 2016 #131
No that is the excuse when confronted zeemike Feb 2016 #135
Sleazy reply mindwalker_i Feb 2016 #192
It's a good question- as in, which SPECIFIC glaring logical fallacy would that fall under. Warren DeMontague Feb 2016 #213
Do have an inkling as to how bad this is going to make you look? frylock Feb 2016 #133
My #1 concern: what Bernie fans on the internet think of me! DanTex Feb 2016 #140
You're a rather prolific poster. I think you do care, Dan. frylock Feb 2016 #144
Mindreading! DanTex Feb 2016 #158
You post multiple times per day (often the same message) on a board dominated by Sanders supporters. frylock Feb 2016 #162
Umm.. that it's fun? Why do you do it? DanTex Feb 2016 #163
It is a lot of fun. frylock Feb 2016 #168
BernieBRO is the proper nomenclature, dude. Warren DeMontague Feb 2016 #212
Oh yes, we know this technique newthinking Feb 2016 #138
Weak analogy. nt malokvale77 Feb 2016 #186
And of course Hillary knew nothing about it 2pooped2pop Feb 2016 #4
+1. It certainly created that impression. nt kristopher Feb 2016 #13
Yes. peacebird Feb 2016 #27
This message was self-deleted by its author 2pooped2pop Feb 2016 #28
She probably chervilant Feb 2016 #34
Exactly 2pooped2pop Feb 2016 #38
The one thing that the Clinton's learn well FlatBaroque Feb 2016 #80
I'm fascinated by the number of people so willing... malokvale77 Feb 2016 #188
I have often wondered about the same thing FlatBaroque Feb 2016 #189
Of course she didn't personally coordinate irregularities (I guess)... SoapBox Feb 2016 #125
I share your opinion. CharlotteVale Feb 2016 #5
Isn't it funny how Bernie followers are acting just as they said Clinton supporters would? wyldwolf Feb 2016 #7
Looks like its not gonna be a two tenths close 2pooped2pop Feb 2016 #10
Who won the pool on how soon it'd take this to become voter fraud if it went to Clinton? KittyWampus Feb 2016 #11
First you should know more about what you are talking about. It's election fraud. Not voter fraud. 2pooped2pop Feb 2016 #16
THANK YOU! it is often a sign of Republicanism to cite voter fraud. Dragonfli Feb 2016 #202
It wouldn't be fraud unless there were actual credible reason to believe that fraud of some kind Gene Debs Feb 2016 #53
You are wrong. zalinda Feb 2016 #77
Truth Rilesome Feb 2016 #184
Counting every vote Mnpaul Feb 2016 #208
Isn't it funny how a 60 point lead became a close race? n/t A Simple Game Feb 2016 #39
Which leads me back to my point. Bernie followers are acting as they said Clinton supporters would.. wyldwolf Feb 2016 #43
You keep saying ornotna Feb 2016 #58
Does that bother you? wyldwolf Feb 2016 #62
It was a simple question ornotna Feb 2016 #64
It DOES bother you. Good. wyldwolf Feb 2016 #66
That's what makes you happy? ornotna Feb 2016 #75
one of many things wyldwolf Feb 2016 #76
Speaks volumes to your character ornotna Feb 2016 #78
"speaks volumes" - such an overused 'progressive' rhetorical crutch wyldwolf Feb 2016 #79
Progressive rhetorical crutch? What a crock. How about "Bernie can't win"? I'd also call that an libdem4life Feb 2016 #171
typical 'progressive' schtick wyldwolf Feb 2016 #173
grasping at straws...all of these were crafted way before Progressive was Cool. Goes with the libdem4life Feb 2016 #176
I guess this is the point where you start blathering about oligarchy wyldwolf Feb 2016 #177
Yes, you would be correct about one of the above, and it does start with an "O". But "blathering", libdem4life Feb 2016 #179
Of course I'm correct. wyldwolf Feb 2016 #180
Of course, dear, you're always correct. Really. libdem4life Feb 2016 #181
you did. thanks! wyldwolf Feb 2016 #183
Carry on. I'm sure there is another Important Thread to which you can add meaning with one liners libdem4life Feb 2016 #185
you've fallen pretty far if you have to get your kicks from teasing people. Perogie Feb 2016 #86
At a post count of 216 (and the fact I essentially took 6 weeks off from DU while traveling) wyldwolf Feb 2016 #87
Oh, then I guess you've always been that low. Sorry my mistake to assume you were once better. Perogie Feb 2016 #88
thanks to a DU PM, my suspicions confirmed. wyldwolf Feb 2016 #89
With followers like you, I can't imagine how Clinton could lose. JoeyT Feb 2016 #104
Now that's the hive collective mentality I'm used to. wyldwolf Feb 2016 #105
Yeah, everyone that thinks for themselves does what they're told and supports Hillary. JoeyT Feb 2016 #118
You're back on track! The Hive Collective Dispatch reach you today at last wyldwolf Feb 2016 #120
What is wrong with wanting to know the actual count. INdemo Feb 2016 #42
because you won't accept them unless the outcome favors Bernie wyldwolf Feb 2016 #45
You are so sure she won. bkkyosemite Feb 2016 #49
I accept the official number from the Iowa Democratic party. YOU, on the other hand... wyldwolf Feb 2016 #51
...want an audit of those official numbers. A perfectly reasonable request. reformist2 Feb 2016 #92
I accept the official number from the Iowa Democratic party. AlbertCat Feb 2016 #145
No the people of IA who were and have seen the flipping of numbers do not bkkyosemite Feb 2016 #195
Of course I will but I just believe the way things have transpired INdemo Feb 2016 #73
the official count has been released. wyldwolf Feb 2016 #74
...and the DesMoines Register articles indicate it is wrong, in many cases. reformist2 Feb 2016 #95
which is speculation by them and NOT the official results. wyldwolf Feb 2016 #97
No, this is what actual delegates and precinct captains have said about the results. They're pissed. reformist2 Feb 2016 #98
So? Others have NOT said that. The official results have been released. wyldwolf Feb 2016 #102
I get a kick out of watching democrats argue against transparency. frylock Feb 2016 #143
I get a kick out of watching 'prooogressiiivves' claim conspiracy every time they lose. wyldwolf Feb 2016 #146
I can't wait until the tables have turned. frylock Feb 2016 #148
the tables HAVE turned. wyldwolf Feb 2016 #149
Enjoy yourself while you can. It's gonna be ugly when this gets ferreted out. frylock Feb 2016 #155
talk about a bookmark-worthy post. wyldwolf Feb 2016 #159
Aptly named as you must have spun around a dozen times greiner3 Feb 2016 #164
an odd, rambling reply from you. wyldwolf Feb 2016 #169
no it hasn't not the raw vote Just the deelegate assignments. INdemo Feb 2016 #132
Bernie followers like the Des Moines Register? frylock Feb 2016 #139
I bet the actual raw votes show a SOLID win for Bernie. stillwaiting Feb 2016 #12
Yes We Will scottie55 Feb 2016 #40
And how many of these wrong transpositions do you have evidence of? randome Feb 2016 #14
Only takes one 2pooped2pop Feb 2016 #17
Ah yes. Vote fraud only happens in other countries. reformist2 Feb 2016 #23
Given the answer you got, that would seem to be none. mythology Feb 2016 #72
The DNC has refused to release the raw vote count, what are they hiding? gyroscope Feb 2016 #15
Ten bucks says it accidentally gets destroyed if a suit is filed 2pooped2pop Feb 2016 #19
i am sure the shredders have already been working overtime. nt restorefreedom Feb 2016 #21
If that is the case, then we will know for sure they cheated gyroscope Feb 2016 #22
absolutely. i hope the register takes it to court. nt restorefreedom Feb 2016 #24
YOU ARE FREE TO DO WHAT WE TELL YOU!!! Yurovsky Feb 2016 #26
If it was Old Codger Feb 2016 #99
as many have pointed out, auto recounts would have already occurred restorefreedom Feb 2016 #20
Of course he won! And EVERYONE KNOWS IT. The cheating, lying, stealing and CORRUPTION is only in_cog_ni_to Feb 2016 #25
The Corruption Is Exactly The Point scottie55 Feb 2016 #47
+1000 MissDeeds Feb 2016 #93
LOL Metric System Feb 2016 #29
Laughing? chervilant Feb 2016 #37
That's all they ever write. DamnYankeeInHouston Feb 2016 #44
I did not know that. chervilant Feb 2016 #48
Nope, that's just my response to things that are so ridiculous they're not worth putting time, Metric System Feb 2016 #52
Post removed Post removed Feb 2016 #147
My party? WTF are you talking about?!? Metric System Feb 2016 #153
You are a democrat, yes? frylock Feb 2016 #157
Oh, so the Democratic party is not your party? So why are you on Democratic Underground? Metric System Feb 2016 #161
I'm here mostly for LBN. frylock Feb 2016 #165
Hillary supporters think this is funny. What if it was the other way around? bkkyosemite Feb 2016 #50
I think Bernie won because of what Hillary did. INdemo Feb 2016 #30
With elections so close all the time.... mdbl Feb 2016 #33
Hopefully, when Bernie is president, he'll get rid of evoting machines (if he survives the hacks) & in_cog_ni_to Feb 2016 #57
discrepancies are adding up restorefreedom Feb 2016 #59
I disagree and would bet Bernie does too... Moral Compass Feb 2016 #63
If she cheated there, she will cheat elsewhere. 2pooped2pop Feb 2016 #85
You're right, it absolutely does. We need to get out in front of this NOW! SammyWinstonJack Feb 2016 #142
full investigation that he is corrupt!! pokhum Feb 2016 #65
Yes, Iowa democrats are cheaters and liars (and enablers of the establishment!) ecstatic Feb 2016 #67
Take it up with the Des Moines Register. frylock Feb 2016 #151
In the most important way, he already did. lumberjack_jeff Feb 2016 #71
ELECTION fraud is not VOTER fraud. Blue State Bandit Feb 2016 #91
Move on HassleCat Feb 2016 #106
Can you please link to some evidence which supports your claim? Motown_Johnny Feb 2016 #107
The obviously anti-Clinton Des Moines register. jeff47 Feb 2016 #175
They are saying Hillary won by 0.25% (as of 2:12 pm CST 2/7/16) Motown_Johnny Feb 2016 #197
Like Bernie said madokie Feb 2016 #108
We must remain vigilant because they plan to pull this shit in every state. Enthusiast Feb 2016 #109
THIS wyldwolf Feb 2016 #113
Could it be that if Bernie followers think this way, it's because Hillary followers behave the Cal33 Feb 2016 #122
more likely because you're given to conspiracies. wyldwolf Feb 2016 #123
We think this way with good reason. It all comes back to the trust issue. Enthusiast Feb 2016 #129
It is about integrity. Bernie made an honest statement: It is a virtual tie. Hillary... TryLogic Feb 2016 #112
It's more about the future... basselope Feb 2016 #116
HRC Is So Desperate To Be POTUS - Nothing Would Surprise This Citizen cantbeserious Feb 2016 #117
You know, that is what they mean when they say that Hillary Helen Borg Feb 2016 #119
... SidDithers Feb 2016 #128
Lying liars! polichick Feb 2016 #136
If these are just mistakes greymattermom Feb 2016 #150
Jesus, who's more dishonest? Not Sure Feb 2016 #154
Reports that there were a lot of people angry over the count. Spitfire of ATJ Feb 2016 #160
An investigation is necessary for transparency's sake 21st Century Poet Feb 2016 #166
whoever won, doesnt matter, lets just see the final numbers. How hard is that? litlbilly Feb 2016 #167
I don't know... dchill Feb 2016 #182
Hahaha kjones Feb 2016 #187
reformist2 is of the opinion that there is "now enough evidence". That's pretty clear IMHO. nt 99th_Monkey Feb 2016 #209
To reiterate... kjones Feb 2016 #210
Debbie, Hillary, and the whole establishment should be in JAIL for election fraud. Odin2005 Feb 2016 #193
What does "Bernie won" TeddyR Feb 2016 #194
I am a Bernie supporter, but I disagree with your OP Motown_Johnny Feb 2016 #198
That small difference is exactly why it should have a recount. jwirr Feb 2016 #216
With any election that close there is almost always a recount. jwirr Feb 2016 #215
"Those who vote decide nothing. Those who count the vote decide everything" - Stalin progree Feb 2016 #217
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»There is now enough evide...»Reply #165