Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

Karma13612

(4,552 posts)

12. This right here is the reason why she should release them now.

Reply to enigmatic (Reply #11)

Tue Feb 16, 2016, 05:53 PM

Feb 2016

If not now, then this issue would rear it's ugly head again in the General, so the GOP can campaign on it ad nauseum.

If she is avoiding it now, does she think it isn't worth revealing the content of the speeches if she isn't the nominee?

She is hoping we forgot about it.

Hahahahahahahahaha.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Third-Rate Speeches [View all] H2O Man Feb 2016 OP

Eloquently expressed. I think she should release the transcripts now. peacebird Feb 2016 #1

Thank you. H2O Man Feb 2016 #5

One gets a true sense from 6 figure "donations" to a non-official person. libdem4life Feb 2016 #2

It wasn't even a donation. It was a fee-for-service arrangement. jeff47 Feb 2016 #3

Indeed. Service in the future, in this case. I wonder if they'll be asking for refunds? libdem4life Feb 2016 #4

Precisely. n/t Jefferson23 Feb 2016 #7

Interesting word, H2O Man Feb 2016 #10

Interesting. H2O Man Feb 2016 #9

She is in trouble either way..the question Todd relayed to her might be his single best Jefferson23 Feb 2016 #6

I agree - she should release them and take any lumps that might follow... cyberswede Feb 2016 #8

I keep going back to this point: enigmatic Feb 2016 #11

This right here is the reason why she should release them now. Karma13612 Feb 2016 #12

I'm glad you brought this up. Gregorian Feb 2016 #13