Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Who We Are [View all]malthaussen
(17,186 posts)33. Not much to add, here.
I suppose there is another agenda that guides the Clinton apologists, a sort of pretzel-logic belief that, if your issues with the candidate are not sufficient to be a deal-breaker, you should say nothing in the name of solidarity. Of course, if your issues with the candidate are a deal-breaker, then you are ipso facto a fool and want to see Ted Cruz in the White House.
It occurs to me that many of Mrs Clinton's supporters are not quite clear on what a primary is for.
-- Mal
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
92 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I think there is a third possible reason for their "right wing attack" characterization
tk2kewl
Feb 2016
#4
Most of the "free thinking" Democratic Party seems to actively avoid debate/discussion these days.
MadDAsHell
Feb 2016
#17
If you came recently you picked an especially bad time. I lurked for years and it's usually...
MadDAsHell
Feb 2016
#27
Now your DU handle is clear...thank you for your work for all of these years and for this post.
libdem4life
Feb 2016
#54