2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: When I'm Mobile [View all]H2O Man
(73,536 posts)I think that there is plenty of proof that clearly backs up what I stated in the OP. I appreciate your taking the time to provide solid examples of it.
Although I was aware of this earlier, I had waited to address the topic until now .....because I do think that there are lots of good people who support Hillary, but who could not have evaluated it properly. I think that's much of the source of the few negative responses here. On the surface, it sounds terrible ....certainly, the Hillary supporters on DU:GDP aren't seeking to disenfranchise voters, in any way. They honestly believe that their candidate is better. And so, when they initially read something like this, they would prefer to think it's inaccurate. Or that it is extremely limited.
But, sad to say, it is not as limited as we might wish. Our society indeed has a 1% that has declared economic warfare on the majority. Our society is currently undergoing a change, to a form of high-tech feudalism. And the Sanders movement is the lone campaign that seeks to address the inequities that allow the 1% to capitalize on the hardships of the many.