Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
The Guardian. stonecutter357 Mar 2016 #1
He is a consult to MSNBC Geronimoe Mar 2016 #22
Guardian is fine. This is just an op-ed from a Hillary supporter. (n/t) thesquanderer Mar 2016 #50
FYI - about the author of this article Lodestar Mar 2016 #2
GREAT resume! Knows what he speaks of wyldwolf Mar 2016 #4
The elite? The untenable status quo? Betty Karlson Mar 2016 #16
Your comment shows that you are the one living in a bubble. Dissing an objective journalist riversedge Mar 2016 #29
Yeah, I'm the one living in a bubble. That's what Rahm said when I asked for equal rights. Betty Karlson Mar 2016 #56
Wolfe is definitely a proven heavyweight. (eom) oasis Mar 2016 #19
When your whole campaign strategy comes down sufrommich Mar 2016 #3
That's a steaming pile RoccoR5955 Mar 2016 #14
+1 stonecutter357 Mar 2016 #24
Indeed MaggieD Mar 2016 #46
Pretty much. giftedgirl77 Mar 2016 #53
Dick Wolfe is very supportive of Hillary. This is an opinion piece. Karma13612 Mar 2016 #5
OF COURSE it's an opinion piece wyldwolf Mar 2016 #6
Only a hillarian would post it as fact. ChairmanAgnostic Mar 2016 #27
how was it posted as 'fact?' wyldwolf Mar 2016 #55
The title implies some sort of political analysis by The Guardian itself Art_from_Ark Mar 2016 #62
A political analysis is an opinion. wyldwolf Mar 2016 #63
But you're attributing the thoughts to The Guardian, not an op-ed columnist. thesquanderer Mar 2016 #66
It wouldn't have appeared in the Guardian if it wasn't approved by the Guardian wyldwolf Mar 2016 #68
That's silly. Sounds like you don't understand the purpose of an op-ed. thesquanderer Mar 2016 #69
No it isn't. Sounds like YOU don't understand the purpose of an op-ed wyldwolf Mar 2016 #70
You don't have to work at a newspaper, you just have to read one. thesquanderer Mar 2016 #72
Apparently you have many misconception about news papers wyldwolf Mar 2016 #74
I don't know about that, but you have at least one. thesquanderer Mar 2016 #75
She's already been running against Single Payer Health Care and "Free Stuff", while focusing on Warren DeMontague Mar 2016 #7
indeed-- what's scary is she is more hawkish than Trump, such as on Iraq Fast Walker 52 Mar 2016 #37
There's only one more country CoffeeCat Mar 2016 #80
pointless commentary Enrique Mar 2016 #8
+1 Art_from_Ark Mar 2016 #61
We still got lots of time. bkkyosemite Mar 2016 #9
And this seething furnace of malice calls himself a journalist? gregcrawford Mar 2016 #10
Sanders isn't perpetuating a hoax BeyondGeography Mar 2016 #11
exactly-- hoax, my ass Fast Walker 52 Mar 2016 #38
+10,000 nt Live and Learn Mar 2016 #59
BULLSHIT! RoccoR5955 Mar 2016 #12
:eyes: VulgarPoet Mar 2016 #13
"comment is free" is what this section i called. Comment is cheap too Betty Karlson Mar 2016 #15
crazy talk Cobalt Violet Mar 2016 #17
I think Bernie did well for super Tuesday considering he doesn't have the AA vote. AgadorSparticus Mar 2016 #18
Don't count the AA vote out, Bernie is going to do better with HoosierRadical Mar 2016 #44
Really? Why do you think that? Nt AgadorSparticus Mar 2016 #57
Because I'm one of them! HoosierRadical Mar 2016 #64
I'm one too!! bravenak Mar 2016 #76
"...but we know who has been there for decades." HoosierRadical Mar 2016 #78
Oh really? bravenak Mar 2016 #79
Definitely. nt Live and Learn Mar 2016 #60
Misleading Headline noretreatnosurrender Mar 2016 #20
isn't a landslide victory winning by more than 10 points? PeterGM Mar 2016 #21
I thought a landslide victory for Hillary was winning by .02%? -none Mar 2016 #40
With three quarters of the delegates and 34 states to go, AllyCat Mar 2016 #23
Thank you for putting this opinion piece where it belongs, instead of LBN. That is where I FailureToCommunicate Mar 2016 #25
The DNC and MSNBC are in lock step erlewyne Mar 2016 #26
Yes, that's true, BUT ... NurseJackie Mar 2016 #28
Oh, the irony nxylas Mar 2016 #30
Check... actually i am just tired of the celebratory opinion pieces tymorial Mar 2016 #31
Group think - Hillary is the inevitable candidate Geronimoe Mar 2016 #32
I am not a Hillary hater but I am a Trump/Cruz/Rubio hater denvine Mar 2016 #33
It is not over until the fat lady sings. PotatoChip Mar 2016 #34
lol cool story, bro. nt restorefreedom Mar 2016 #35
Nice try. beerandjesus Mar 2016 #36
It's all about the delegates... SidDithers Mar 2016 #39
Please pivot, Hillary! ejbr Mar 2016 #41
Go look at the author and have a good laugh. DrBulldog Mar 2016 #42
K & R SunSeeker Mar 2016 #43
Yep MaggieD Mar 2016 #45
lol EndElectoral Mar 2016 #47
"Now she needs to prove that her version of love can beat Trump’s version of hate." DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2016 #48
Spin Spin Spin. The cold hard truth? debunction.junction Mar 2016 #49
Horse Shit Puppyjive Mar 2016 #51
Brings to mind the Chicago Daily Tribune headline from 1948 - "Dewey Defeats Truman" TxGrandpa Mar 2016 #52
K&R ismnotwasm Mar 2016 #54
K and R oasis Mar 2016 #58
I am sure he will throw some hail mary passes but yes, the game riversedge Mar 2016 #65
But, but ... CALIFORNIA! NurseJackie Mar 2016 #67
It might be wise to encourage Bernie to stay in, even if he's behind . . . just in case. Vinca Mar 2016 #71
Will Sanders stay in after his next upcoming drubbing? MaggieD Mar 2016 #73
I'm beginning to think that global warming nichomachus Mar 2016 #77
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»The Guardian - The cold, ...»Reply #71