Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

0rganism

(23,944 posts)
6. i suspect, by now, "the public at large" thinks they know at least something about who he is
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 02:22 PM
Mar 2016

really, you'd have to be intentionally not paying attention to not know a little by now.

i've seen rightwingers openly calling him a communist, so they clearly have at least some ideas about him; they're probably still skittish about opening up on him for being a Jew.

initially, the Sanders supporters were claiming his super-low numbers (back in the 3-5% days) were due to people not knowing about him or his positions, and they predicted his numbers would rise when people figured it out. well, they've risen. significantly.

he's not polling 3-5% anymore. i haven't seen any recent name recognition polling (there was plenty of it, back about 3-4 months), and my takeaway from that is it's a settled issue -- people basically know who he is and what he's doing. he's not "Candidate X" anymore.

you'd be correct to say Hillary is a known quantity to voters -- and based on the polls i've seen of "the public at large", they don't like her much and they don't trust her. going by the numbers i've seen, there is a simpler explanation for the preliminary ge poll numbers being as they are: general election voters would rather vote for Sanders than Clinton.

the "the public doesn't know about Bernie yet" line becomes less plausible every day.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»"In Nearly Every Blue, Pu...»Reply #6