Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
You got it! yallerdawg Mar 2016 #1
I actually hopes she hammers this point home in tonight's debate kennetha Mar 2016 #3
K & R Nonhlanhla Mar 2016 #2
The UAW disagrees with you Omaha Steve Mar 2016 #4
The UAW disagrees with my analysis of Hillary's real point? kennetha Mar 2016 #6
See reply #7 Omaha Steve Mar 2016 #13
Do you know who Neil Barofsky is and why his opinion should matter? think Mar 2016 #5
He's a mixed bag kennetha Mar 2016 #20
Go on.... think Mar 2016 #25
NO. There were other ways to deal with the big banks going belly up. Avalux Mar 2016 #7
There are always logically possible alternatives kennetha Mar 2016 #8
If Tarp had been voted down what do you think would have happened? If if was so vitally important PoliticAverse Mar 2016 #11
Choosing extremely flawed legislation like TARP over trying to find GOOD solutions to huge problems think Mar 2016 #17
you'd prefer a depression? kennetha Mar 2016 #19
No. I prefer that better legislation passed. And it could have had Democrats pushed for it. think Mar 2016 #24
The "real world" is a fucked up place last I checked ... ThePhilosopher04 Mar 2016 #28
And again you miss the real fallout from Clinton's point. It caused people to discuss PoliticAverse Mar 2016 #9
x 100000 AtomicKitten Mar 2016 #42
No, Clinton was lying.... again. Motown_Johnny Mar 2016 #10
you are not refuting my point kennetha Mar 2016 #12
Your point has no foundation. Motown_Johnny Mar 2016 #14
It was the only answer on the floor that was going to pass kennetha Mar 2016 #15
I think they should have been allowed to fail because depositors were protected. Motown_Johnny Mar 2016 #16
Ok, you get a cookie for winning the word parsing game ... ThePhilosopher04 Mar 2016 #30
Out of balance zipplewrath Mar 2016 #43
Was going to respond to this mischaracterized nonsense, but the Michigan voters already have. EndElectoral Mar 2016 #18
Hillary claimed Bernie OPPOSED the auto bailout which was a LIE. No parsing of words changes that. AtomicKitten Mar 2016 #21
Actually that's not at all what she said. she was quite precise in her language. kennetha Mar 2016 #27
From her own big mouth: AtomicKitten Mar 2016 #29
He vote against the money that ended up saving the Auto INdustry kennetha Mar 2016 #31
SHE SAID VERBATIM "HE WAS AGAINST THE AUTO BAILOUT" - THAT WAS A LIE. AtomicKitten Mar 2016 #32
it was flat out true kennetha Mar 2016 #34
you are flat out lying to try to cover her butt for lying AtomicKitten Mar 2016 #40
Real thinking Americans understand what Bernie did ... ThePhilosopher04 Mar 2016 #22
What Sanders did was no different than what MOST DEMOCRATS DID in 2008 Armstead Mar 2016 #23
But the democrats -- most of them anyway kennetha Mar 2016 #26
I agree with you when you say most Dems ... ThePhilosopher04 Mar 2016 #33
This is like Gwhittey Mar 2016 #35
Here's what lost Michigan for her: Bluenorthwest Mar 2016 #36
Probably Republicans voting for Sanders kennetha Mar 2016 #37
What "lost" Michigan for Hillary is more people agree ... ThePhilosopher04 Mar 2016 #41
seriously doubt that kennetha Mar 2016 #44
Exactly. She lost all credibility with that line of attack ... ThePhilosopher04 Mar 2016 #39
yes Bernie is a fraud. kennetha Mar 2016 #45
Yes. I'd double down on that attack. It obviously worked really well in Michigan. DefenseLawyer Mar 2016 #38
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»The Point about TARP, the...»Reply #44