Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Yes, and so is LWolf Mar 2016 #1
If she is nominated it will be because Democratic voters nominated her. yellowcanine Mar 2016 #7
and if she loses the GE it will because not enough tk2kewl Mar 2016 #9
Many Independent and Republican women will vote Clinton against Trump. yellowcanine Mar 2016 #12
that's a gamble I'm not comfortable with tk2kewl Mar 2016 #13
So what is your solution? Over-rule the voters? yellowcanine Mar 2016 #20
keep pushing to the convention tk2kewl Mar 2016 #22
The OP says "Nominating a Pres. Candidate...." That happens at the convention. yellowcanine Mar 2016 #26
Glad you feel confident about your gambling with the world's future. nt vintx Mar 2016 #14
you are assuming something that has not yet happened. I am not so sure Trump will Hiraeth Mar 2016 #42
OR, she will lose because her message and positions are uninspiring to those voters. guillaumeb Mar 2016 #29
Of course. LWolf Mar 2016 #27
Touche' ViseGrip Mar 2016 #2
This argument has failed and failed again alcibiades_mystery Mar 2016 #3
until it's not tk2kewl Mar 2016 #10
Do you have a contribution you'd like to make in support of that argument? imagine2015 Mar 2016 #16
Isn't this supposed to convince people to nominate somebody else, though? alcibiades_mystery Mar 2016 #23
Thank you, Karl Rove! JaneyVee Mar 2016 #4
Great idea, ignore reality. Matariki Mar 2016 #8
What are you thanking Karl Rove for? He's a Republican and a-hole. You didn't know that? imagine2015 Mar 2016 #17
again they arent investigating her... artyteacher Mar 2016 #5
I Just Thought That This Thread Needs To Consider The Following..... global1 Mar 2016 #15
Has it been established that Clinton is a target of the FBI investigation? yellowcanine Mar 2016 #6
Always assume the worst. It's the only way to go through life. randome Mar 2016 #24
It has been established that she in NOT the target. leftofcool Mar 2016 #39
Apparently, the voters disagree with this assment Tarc Mar 2016 #11
Which voters? The tens of millions who will not vote until the General Election? imagine2015 Mar 2016 #18
You're making a claim unsupported by the reality of the primary voting thus far Tarc Mar 2016 #25
It's not a claim. It's a fact. Tens of millions of people who haven't voted in the primaries imagine2015 Mar 2016 #31
clap louder for the Indictment Fairy, Bernie fans! nt geek tragedy Mar 2016 #19
No indictment needed. Hell Hath No Fury Mar 2016 #33
That was a in the gutter nasty comment. Why do you hate liberals so much? imagine2015 Mar 2016 #35
I hear it's not well.. because of us and our unicorns on justice mmonk Mar 2016 #21
Very clear understanding. . . . it's one or the other. . . . .neither is good for her campaign pdsimdars Mar 2016 #28
So MANY skeletons... AzDar Mar 2016 #30
Yup. Hell Hath No Fury Mar 2016 #32
That and a batch of other really nasty commercials to discredit her. imagine2015 Mar 2016 #38
Not for a dollar in a pocket. mmonk Mar 2016 #34
"Shut-up!" they explained. Nuclear Unicorn Mar 2016 #36
The investigation is expected creeksneakers2 Mar 2016 #37
Epic Fail leftofcool Mar 2016 #40
Death throes of a dying campaign. nt LexVegas Mar 2016 #41
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Nominating a Presidential...»Reply #10