Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Nominating a Presidential Candidate Under Active FBI Investigation Is An Incredibly Risky Gamble [View all]vintx
(1,748 posts)14. Glad you feel confident about your gambling with the world's future. nt
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
42 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Nominating a Presidential Candidate Under Active FBI Investigation Is An Incredibly Risky Gamble [View all]
imagine2015
Mar 2016
OP
The OP says "Nominating a Pres. Candidate...." That happens at the convention.
yellowcanine
Mar 2016
#26
you are assuming something that has not yet happened. I am not so sure Trump will
Hiraeth
Mar 2016
#42
OR, she will lose because her message and positions are uninspiring to those voters.
guillaumeb
Mar 2016
#29
Isn't this supposed to convince people to nominate somebody else, though?
alcibiades_mystery
Mar 2016
#23
What are you thanking Karl Rove for? He's a Republican and a-hole. You didn't know that?
imagine2015
Mar 2016
#17
Which voters? The tens of millions who will not vote until the General Election?
imagine2015
Mar 2016
#18
It's not a claim. It's a fact. Tens of millions of people who haven't voted in the primaries
imagine2015
Mar 2016
#31