Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Nominating a Presidential Candidate Under Active FBI Investigation Is An Incredibly Risky Gamble [View all]Hell Hath No Fury
(16,327 posts)32. Yup.
The GOP won't even have to prove anything wrong was done just refer to the investigation, over and over and over, on an endless loop. The ads write themselves.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
42 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Nominating a Presidential Candidate Under Active FBI Investigation Is An Incredibly Risky Gamble [View all]
imagine2015
Mar 2016
OP
The OP says "Nominating a Pres. Candidate...." That happens at the convention.
yellowcanine
Mar 2016
#26
you are assuming something that has not yet happened. I am not so sure Trump will
Hiraeth
Mar 2016
#42
OR, she will lose because her message and positions are uninspiring to those voters.
guillaumeb
Mar 2016
#29
Isn't this supposed to convince people to nominate somebody else, though?
alcibiades_mystery
Mar 2016
#23
What are you thanking Karl Rove for? He's a Republican and a-hole. You didn't know that?
imagine2015
Mar 2016
#17
Which voters? The tens of millions who will not vote until the General Election?
imagine2015
Mar 2016
#18
It's not a claim. It's a fact. Tens of millions of people who haven't voted in the primaries
imagine2015
Mar 2016
#31