Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

In reply to the discussion: Foreign Policies [View all]

H2O Man

(73,506 posts)
23. Great points, joshcryer!
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 10:24 AM
Mar 2016

It's not as if these Democrats did not have access to accurate information. They were not limited to the "mushroom cloud" bullshit the Cheney/Bush administration was scaring the general public with. They knew.

Your post brings up an important issue: is disagreeing with elected representatives a form of disloyalty to the Democratic Party? More, do people believe that what it means to be a Democrat is defined by the positions that those elected officials take? In my opinion, there is both a right and a responsibility for registered Democrats to disagree with elected officials -- especially in cases involving the potential for warfare. I do not believe that any one person, or group of elites, defines the party ....in fact, I know that in situations like the march to war with Iraq, they betrayed the party.

Hence, I find it repugnant when some here take the self-righteous position that those of us who dare question the authority of elected officials need to "start our own party."

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Foreign Policies»Reply #23