Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Bernie handling Maddow! [View all]napi21
(45,806 posts)21. Yes, unfortunately so. I don't like them, but they're legal Until they're not, candidates can use
their money. That doesn't mean that candidate won't feel some "loyalty" to that SP group. I think I know why most candidates won't fight against SP. They aren't sure they can do what Bernie is doin, getting lots of small donors to support their run.
If it ever gets overturned, I guess we'll all see.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
68 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Yep he is so smart he is going to get all those Congress critters who endorced Hillary to flip to
upaloopa
Mar 2016
#1
We side with the 99% who do you side with? Goldman-Sachs? Do you think they will
rhett o rick
Mar 2016
#4
The corporation know full well the value of propaganda. Sooner or later you will harm
rhett o rick
Mar 2016
#49
The truth is plain to see. Clinton accepts money and huge money from the Ruling Class
rhett o rick
Mar 2016
#55
Well, rhett, you get on that "plane" and ride! Godspeed. The rest of us will be voting Hillary into
Squinch
Mar 2016
#56
And you will be dancing in the streets as Goldman-Sachs continues to loot our resources.
rhett o rick
Mar 2016
#57
Sure rhett! Everyone who disagrees with you is the devil. We get your drift. Your very monotonous,
Squinch
Mar 2016
#58
You've choosen sides in this class war and it is not the side of the People.
rhett o rick
Mar 2016
#59
Is this one of those refrigerator sets where you mix up the words? Does it not have words to
Squinch
Mar 2016
#60
IF she won a state by 10 -> 30 pts & the SDs of that state endorSed Senator Sanders- wouldn't you
jillan
Mar 2016
#6
You can't give the man a break, can you? You won't even let him be called intelligent without
DisgustipatedinCA
Mar 2016
#17
A lot. One-letter word (article) followed by a three-letter word (noun).
DisgustipatedinCA
Mar 2016
#18
I still hate SD's, but they're there, and until they're gone, you do what you have to do to win.
napi21
Mar 2016
#15
Yes, unfortunately so. I don't like them, but they're legal Until they're not, candidates can use
napi21
Mar 2016
#21
When they noticed the discrepency between those "appointed" delegates and the will of the voters
pdsimdars
Mar 2016
#61
Maddow's intention was fully exposed with her gossip session with Chris Hayes. That was childish.
snowy owl
Mar 2016
#23
Welcome to DU, where AA's are called racist and women are sexist against themselves or something.
Shandris
Mar 2016
#22
The excitement over successfully doing an interview with a progressive is interesting. Nt
NCTraveler
Mar 2016
#16
That's your opinion. Progressive before she filled her pockets with MSM gold?
snowy owl
Mar 2016
#38