Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: WHOA! NYR is no RW rag! THIS IS A MUST READ! "The Clinton System" [View all]farleftlib
(2,125 posts)104. Just Wow!
During Hillary Clintons tenure as secretary of state, US defense corporations and their overseas clients also contributed between $54 and $141 million to the Clinton Foundation. (Because the foundation discloses a range of values within which the contributions of particular donors might fall, only minimum and maximum estimates can be given.) In the same period, these US defense corporations and their overseas government clients also paid a total of $625,000 to Bill Clinton in speaking fees.
In March 2011, for example, Bill Clinton was paid $175,000 by the Kuwait America Foundation to be the guest of honor and keynote speaker at its annual Washington gala. Among the sponsors were Boeing and the government of Kuwait, through its Washington embassy. Shortly before, the State Department, under Hillary Clinton, had authorized a $693 million deal to provide Kuwait with Boeings Globemaster military transport aircraft. As secretary of state, Hillary Clinton had the statutory duty to rule on whether proposed arms deals with foreign governments were in the USs national interest.
In March 2011, for example, Bill Clinton was paid $175,000 by the Kuwait America Foundation to be the guest of honor and keynote speaker at its annual Washington gala. Among the sponsors were Boeing and the government of Kuwait, through its Washington embassy. Shortly before, the State Department, under Hillary Clinton, had authorized a $693 million deal to provide Kuwait with Boeings Globemaster military transport aircraft. As secretary of state, Hillary Clinton had the statutory duty to rule on whether proposed arms deals with foreign governments were in the USs national interest.
K & R and Bookmarked.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
180 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
WHOA! NYR is no RW rag! THIS IS A MUST READ! "The Clinton System" [View all]
snagglepuss
Mar 2016
OP
The one that bugs me the most was BC being paid $600,000 to make a speech for Dutch insurer Achmea
Baobab
Mar 2016
#144
And this Government employee gets fired for accepting a 20 dollar tip...
Avalon Sparks
Mar 2016
#151
Another juicy nugget. Foreign govt $$$ to Clinton Foundation while Clinton was SecState, quid pro?
peacebird
Mar 2016
#53
I think your statement only serves to reinforce the point you're responding to. nt
DisgustipatedinCA
Mar 2016
#87
The Facts On Hillary Are Readily Available... The Problem Is The Lemmings...
CorporatistNation
Mar 2016
#146
We need to stand behind Sanders now. MSM is out to make him step out..Enough
bkkyosemite
Mar 2016
#3
the real problem is neoliberalism and a cover up of its real goal, which is reversing the good.
Baobab
Mar 2016
#145
Hillary was paying Sidney Blumenthal something like $120,000 from the Foundation
snagglepuss
Mar 2016
#125
Simon Head nails it when he calls this a "system" because it is so massive and complex.
snagglepuss
Mar 2016
#169
Do you mean an article about the Foundation? I think it's scandalous that the NYT
snagglepuss
Mar 2016
#171
She doubled arms sales to dodgy countries as SOS following donations to the Clinton Foundation.
AtomicKitten
Mar 2016
#6
If she's elected, good times for Hill, Bill, Barack, Donald and all their 1% er friends.
nc4bo
Mar 2016
#9
Clearly just another RW hit piece, hence the lack of any commentary by Clinton's supporters.
vintx
Mar 2016
#12
Case in point: One of the day's more high-minded threads is sinking like a stone
RufusTFirefly
Mar 2016
#70
All the Clinton foundation based attacks on Hillary have a similar structure
stevenleser
Mar 2016
#129
It is bigger which is why NYT tucked it away in NYR. There is no reason this is in NYR
snagglepuss
Mar 2016
#114
Agreed - How Could Any Democrat - In Good Conscience - Vote For Such An Unethical Candidate
cantbeserious
Mar 2016
#81
According to google searches no one has covered this brilliant, damning piece of
snagglepuss
Mar 2016
#85
The Corporatist Clinton Corruption Exposed For All The World To See - Yet The DNC Looks Askance
cantbeserious
Mar 2016
#79
Their followers don't care what they've done or will do. There new motto is "The Ends Justify The
rhett o rick
Mar 2016
#89
A handful of those on DU may not care but many other Clinton supporters assume all
snagglepuss
Mar 2016
#94
Such a nice man, the Kazahk prez. How could anyone refuse. It would be an insult.
snagglepuss
Mar 2016
#101
For some reason this piece written almost 2 months ago has got no attention. Everyone needs
snagglepuss
Mar 2016
#97
Tough to read this stuff. But people just don't want to hear it, or even entertain believing it.
EndElectoral
Mar 2016
#113
Interesting observation. I've always wanted to know the darker side of practically everything,
snagglepuss
Mar 2016
#124
One of the most disturbing articles I've ever read about politics and corruption
Impedimentus
Mar 2016
#119
This should have been on the NYT's front page but instead it got hidden in NYR Daily.
snagglepuss
Mar 2016
#135
I don't understand how any Clinton supporter can read this and not reconsider their position.
Impedimentus
Mar 2016
#141
There seems to be nothing else to Hillary Rodham Clinton, but this amoral shit.
delrem
Mar 2016
#150