LOL! Maybe we all do. (Reply #44) - Democratic Underground

In the discussion thread: Bernie handling Maddow! [View all]

Response to silvershadow (Reply #43)

Fri Mar 18, 2016, 11:20 PM

Skid Rogue (711 posts)

44. LOL! Maybe we all do.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

68 replies	Author	Time	Post
Bernie handling Maddow! [View all]	snowy owl	Mar 2016	OP
Yep he is so smart he is going to get all those Congress critters who endorced Hillary to flip to	upaloopa	Mar 2016	#1
He's an agent of change. YOU don't get it.	snowy owl	Mar 2016	#2
Exactly what has he done in his decades in Congress to facilitate that change?	Squinch	Mar 2016	#54
We side with the 99% who do you side with? Goldman-Sachs? Do you think they will	rhett o rick	Mar 2016	#4
And yet somehow your 99% doesn't add up to a majority. Funny that.	Squinch	Mar 2016	#36
Haha!!	boston bean	Mar 2016	#41
The corporation know full well the value of propaganda. Sooner or later you will harm	rhett o rick	Mar 2016	#49
Sooner or later you will learn two things: 1) what constitutes a majority and	Squinch	Mar 2016	#53
The truth is plain to see. Clinton accepts money and huge money from the Ruling Class	rhett o rick	Mar 2016	#55
Well, rhett, you get on that "plane" and ride! Godspeed. The rest of us will be voting Hillary into	Squinch	Mar 2016	#56
And you will be dancing in the streets as Goldman-Sachs continues to loot our resources.	rhett o rick	Mar 2016	#57
Sure rhett! Everyone who disagrees with you is the devil. We get your drift. Your very monotonous,	Squinch	Mar 2016	#58
You've choosen sides in this class war and it is not the side of the People.	rhett o rick	Mar 2016	#59
Is this one of those refrigerator sets where you mix up the words? Does it not have words to	Squinch	Mar 2016	#60
IF she won a state by 10 -> 30 pts & the SDs of that state endorSed Senator Sanders- wouldn't you	jillan	Mar 2016	#6
You can't give the man a break, can you? You won't even let him be called intelligent without	DisgustipatedinCA	Mar 2016	#17
Calling him intelligent is giving him a well deserved compliment	72DejaVu	Mar 2016	#37
The Support of Congress Critters	Silver_Witch	Mar 2016	#51
Bernie did great on Rachel's show.	napi21	Mar 2016	#3
But, but...	asuhornets	Mar 2016	#10
Relay	Gwhittey	Mar 2016	#11
Actually it says alot..	asuhornets	Mar 2016	#13
A lot. One-letter word (article) followed by a three-letter word (noun).	DisgustipatedinCA	Mar 2016	#18
Like super PACs? They're not going away but Sanders sure is ignoring them	uponit7771	Mar 2016	#19
Exactly	Silver_Witch	Mar 2016	#52
I still hate SD's, but they're there, and until they're gone, you do what you have to do to win.	napi21	Mar 2016	#15
Same thing with super PACs right?	uponit7771	Mar 2016	#20
Yes, unfortunately so. I don't like them, but they're legal Until they're not, candidates can use	napi21	Mar 2016	#21
When they noticed the discrepency between those "appointed" delegates and the will of the voters	pdsimdars	Mar 2016	#61
Maddow's intention was fully exposed with her gossip session with Chris Hayes. That was childish.	snowy owl	Mar 2016	#23
I missed the whole thing.	truedelphi	Mar 2016	#29
Bernie is going to make seven dimension chess look like checkers.	Hiraeth	Mar 2016	#5
And if Bernie doesn't show them, his followers will.	truedelphi	Mar 2016	#30
that'll show those women who can "handle" them nt	msongs	Mar 2016	#7
Really?	NowSam	Mar 2016	#8
Welcome to DU, where AA's are called racist and women are sexist against themselves or something.	Shandris	Mar 2016	#22
What "women?"	senz	Mar 2016	#25
Kick and R	BeanMusical	Mar 2016	#9
He handles Women?	sheshe2	Mar 2016	#12
Is "Handle" now a misogynist word?	Tom Rinaldo	Mar 2016	#14
Oh, please.	senz	Mar 2016	#26
The excitement over successfully doing an interview with a progressive is interesting. Nt	NCTraveler	Mar 2016	#16
Yes, it was successful so why couldn't she understand what he said?	snowy owl	Mar 2016	#24
She's media -- totally in the bag for Hillary.	senz	Mar 2016	#27
Well she should be excited over doing an interview with a progressive.	senz	Mar 2016	#28
I would imagine it's exciting...	NCTraveler	Mar 2016	#31
Especially one who's actually a progessive.	senz	Mar 2016	#33
Stating Maddow as anything other than progressive is something new to me.	NCTraveler	Mar 2016	#35
That's your opinion. Progressive before she filled her pockets with MSM gold?	snowy owl	Mar 2016	#38
I wish. But she works for Comcast and they call the shots.	senz	Mar 2016	#40
It's about principles.	Skid Rogue	Mar 2016	#32
If you like principles, why are you supporting Hillary?	senz	Mar 2016	#34
This message was self-deleted by its author	snowy owl	Mar 2016	#39
That's the same thought that came to mind . . . . talk about a contradiction	pdsimdars	Mar 2016	#62
Honestly...	Skid Rogue	Mar 2016	#42
Wow, what revisionist history.	ChairmanAgnostic	Mar 2016	#46
Um... that's how I experienced what we now call history.	Skid Rogue	Mar 2016	#47
Post removed	Post removed	Mar 2016	#48
tomorrow.... cause I worked my ass off today.	Skid Rogue	Mar 2016	#50
Nice summary, but a bit wordy don't you think	pdsimdars	Mar 2016	#63
That's the truth.	snowy owl	Mar 2016	#65
I pretty much agree with everything	pdsimdars	Mar 2016	#66
Wasn't Michigan State the first land grant college?	LisaM	Mar 2016	#68
And isn't there anther list that is more important	pdsimdars	Mar 2016	#64
I never would have dreamed I would be saying this, but	silvershadow	Mar 2016	#43
LOL! Maybe we all do.	Skid Rogue	Mar 2016	#44
:-). nt	silvershadow	Mar 2016	#45
emotional voter?	snowy owl	Mar 2016	#67

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.