Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

In reply to the discussion: Bernie handling Maddow! [View all]

Response to Skid Rogue (Reply #47)

Bernie handling Maddow! [View all] snowy owl Mar 2016 OP
Yep he is so smart he is going to get all those Congress critters who endorced Hillary to flip to upaloopa Mar 2016 #1
He's an agent of change. YOU don't get it. snowy owl Mar 2016 #2
Exactly what has he done in his decades in Congress to facilitate that change? Squinch Mar 2016 #54
We side with the 99% who do you side with? Goldman-Sachs? Do you think they will rhett o rick Mar 2016 #4
And yet somehow your 99% doesn't add up to a majority. Funny that. Squinch Mar 2016 #36
Haha!! boston bean Mar 2016 #41
The corporation know full well the value of propaganda. Sooner or later you will harm rhett o rick Mar 2016 #49
Sooner or later you will learn two things: 1) what constitutes a majority and Squinch Mar 2016 #53
The truth is plain to see. Clinton accepts money and huge money from the Ruling Class rhett o rick Mar 2016 #55
Well, rhett, you get on that "plane" and ride! Godspeed. The rest of us will be voting Hillary into Squinch Mar 2016 #56
And you will be dancing in the streets as Goldman-Sachs continues to loot our resources. rhett o rick Mar 2016 #57
Sure rhett! Everyone who disagrees with you is the devil. We get your drift. Your very monotonous, Squinch Mar 2016 #58
You've choosen sides in this class war and it is not the side of the People. rhett o rick Mar 2016 #59
Is this one of those refrigerator sets where you mix up the words? Does it not have words to Squinch Mar 2016 #60
IF she won a state by 10 -> 30 pts & the SDs of that state endorSed Senator Sanders- wouldn't you jillan Mar 2016 #6
You can't give the man a break, can you? You won't even let him be called intelligent without DisgustipatedinCA Mar 2016 #17
Calling him intelligent is giving him a well deserved compliment 72DejaVu Mar 2016 #37
The Support of Congress Critters Silver_Witch Mar 2016 #51
Bernie did great on Rachel's show. napi21 Mar 2016 #3
But, but... asuhornets Mar 2016 #10
Relay Gwhittey Mar 2016 #11
Actually it says alot.. asuhornets Mar 2016 #13
A lot. One-letter word (article) followed by a three-letter word (noun). DisgustipatedinCA Mar 2016 #18
Like super PACs? They're not going away but Sanders sure is ignoring them uponit7771 Mar 2016 #19
Exactly Silver_Witch Mar 2016 #52
I still hate SD's, but they're there, and until they're gone, you do what you have to do to win. napi21 Mar 2016 #15
Same thing with super PACs right? uponit7771 Mar 2016 #20
Yes, unfortunately so. I don't like them, but they're legal Until they're not, candidates can use napi21 Mar 2016 #21
When they noticed the discrepency between those "appointed" delegates and the will of the voters pdsimdars Mar 2016 #61
Maddow's intention was fully exposed with her gossip session with Chris Hayes. That was childish. snowy owl Mar 2016 #23
I missed the whole thing. truedelphi Mar 2016 #29
Bernie is going to make seven dimension chess look like checkers. Hiraeth Mar 2016 #5
And if Bernie doesn't show them, his followers will. truedelphi Mar 2016 #30
that'll show those women who can "handle" them nt msongs Mar 2016 #7
Really? NowSam Mar 2016 #8
Welcome to DU, where AA's are called racist and women are sexist against themselves or something. Shandris Mar 2016 #22
What "women?" senz Mar 2016 #25
Kick and R BeanMusical Mar 2016 #9
He handles Women? sheshe2 Mar 2016 #12
Is "Handle" now a misogynist word? Tom Rinaldo Mar 2016 #14
Oh, please. senz Mar 2016 #26
The excitement over successfully doing an interview with a progressive is interesting. Nt NCTraveler Mar 2016 #16
Yes, it was successful so why couldn't she understand what he said? snowy owl Mar 2016 #24
She's media -- totally in the bag for Hillary. senz Mar 2016 #27
Well she should be excited over doing an interview with a progressive. senz Mar 2016 #28
I would imagine it's exciting... NCTraveler Mar 2016 #31
Especially one who's actually a progessive. senz Mar 2016 #33
Stating Maddow as anything other than progressive is something new to me. NCTraveler Mar 2016 #35
That's your opinion. Progressive before she filled her pockets with MSM gold? snowy owl Mar 2016 #38
I wish. But she works for Comcast and they call the shots. senz Mar 2016 #40
It's about principles. Skid Rogue Mar 2016 #32
If you like principles, why are you supporting Hillary? senz Mar 2016 #34
This message was self-deleted by its author snowy owl Mar 2016 #39
That's the same thought that came to mind . . . . talk about a contradiction pdsimdars Mar 2016 #62
Honestly... Skid Rogue Mar 2016 #42
Wow, what revisionist history. ChairmanAgnostic Mar 2016 #46
Um... that's how I experienced what we now call history. Skid Rogue Mar 2016 #47
Post removed Post removed Mar 2016 #48
tomorrow.... cause I worked my ass off today. Skid Rogue Mar 2016 #50
Nice summary, but a bit wordy don't you think pdsimdars Mar 2016 #63
That's the truth. snowy owl Mar 2016 #65
I pretty much agree with everything pdsimdars Mar 2016 #66
Wasn't Michigan State the first land grant college? LisaM Mar 2016 #68
And isn't there anther list that is more important pdsimdars Mar 2016 #64
I never would have dreamed I would be saying this, but silvershadow Mar 2016 #43
LOL! Maybe we all do. Skid Rogue Mar 2016 #44
:-). nt silvershadow Mar 2016 #45
emotional voter? snowy owl Mar 2016 #67
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Bernie handling Maddow!»Reply #48