Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: A year from now when Hillary is President nothing will change..... [View all]RiverLover
(7,830 posts)28. She's confirmed she knows how to spin things & gets her people to follow suit, that's it.
One big way that Bernie Sanders could help black voters financially
WaPo
3/1/16
......snip.......
Sanders's plan would help workers with scarce earnings and savings by making their Social Security benefits more generous and by increasing the annual cost-of-living adjustment.
[How Social Security penalizes working women]
At the same time, his plan would help middle-class workers and young people. Social Security is running out of money, and the agency projects it won't be able to pay beneficiaries what they are owed starting in 2034.
Sanders's plan would improve the program's finances, guaranteeing that all workers are paid in full through 2074, according to a recent analysis by Social Security's actuaries.
The wealthy would pick up the tab. Sanders would levy taxes of 6.2 percent on income over $250,000 in both salaries and capital gains.
Clinton has not given her support to such a broad expansion of Social Security, or put forward a plan detailing what changes she would make to the system or how she would pay for them.
Broadly, she has said she wants to help widows and female retirees in particular. They generally receive less from Social Security because they spend more years out of the labor force raising children or caring for loved ones.
It's a particular problem for black women, who are strong supporters of Clinton (89 percent of black female Democrats cast ballots for Clinton in South Carolina's primary on Saturday). That's because Social Security offers spousal and survivors' benefits for retirees whose husbands or wives made substantially more than they did. Black women, however, are less likely to marry, and if they do, they are more likely to earn as much as their spouses.
As of 2009, more than a third of black women in late middle age would be ineligible for these benefits in retirement, about twice the number of white and Hispanic women who would not receive them.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/03/01/white-privilege-is-being-able-to-retire/
WaPo
3/1/16
......snip.......
Sanders's plan would help workers with scarce earnings and savings by making their Social Security benefits more generous and by increasing the annual cost-of-living adjustment.
[How Social Security penalizes working women]
At the same time, his plan would help middle-class workers and young people. Social Security is running out of money, and the agency projects it won't be able to pay beneficiaries what they are owed starting in 2034.
Sanders's plan would improve the program's finances, guaranteeing that all workers are paid in full through 2074, according to a recent analysis by Social Security's actuaries.
The wealthy would pick up the tab. Sanders would levy taxes of 6.2 percent on income over $250,000 in both salaries and capital gains.
Clinton has not given her support to such a broad expansion of Social Security, or put forward a plan detailing what changes she would make to the system or how she would pay for them.
Broadly, she has said she wants to help widows and female retirees in particular. They generally receive less from Social Security because they spend more years out of the labor force raising children or caring for loved ones.
It's a particular problem for black women, who are strong supporters of Clinton (89 percent of black female Democrats cast ballots for Clinton in South Carolina's primary on Saturday). That's because Social Security offers spousal and survivors' benefits for retirees whose husbands or wives made substantially more than they did. Black women, however, are less likely to marry, and if they do, they are more likely to earn as much as their spouses.
As of 2009, more than a third of black women in late middle age would be ineligible for these benefits in retirement, about twice the number of white and Hispanic women who would not receive them.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/03/01/white-privilege-is-being-able-to-retire/
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
182 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
A year from now when Hillary is President nothing will change..... [View all]
highoverheadspace
Mar 2016
OP
In case you didn't get it, I despise Trump and am all onboard for Bernie!
highoverheadspace
Mar 2016
#9
Well then state your case for Bernie. Don't stink up DU with your hyperbolic bashing.
JTFrog
Mar 2016
#88
I read the OP. Nothing but a bunch of hyperbolic bashing and equating with Republicans. n/t
JTFrog
Mar 2016
#95
Given the repetitiveness in the anti-Hillary attacks by Bernie supporters ...
JoePhilly
Mar 2016
#77
That's what JaneyVee's hidden post says but it is a false witness against a DUer.
Bluenorthwest
Mar 2016
#60
Instead of complaining about public sentiment, why don't you present a case as to why you believe
highoverheadspace
Mar 2016
#97
Let me do you one better, you can go to Bernies page and go right down the list of his entire
highoverheadspace
Mar 2016
#119
What exactly is Trump puffing and why would you accuse anyone here of doing it?
polly7
Mar 2016
#155
As a matrilineal Jew seeing my mom's religion used as a cudgel makes me apoplectic.
DemocratSinceBirth
Mar 2016
#47
We're dealing with the most conservative Court since the 50s, if not the 30s
BeyondGeography
Mar 2016
#67
No, that is a RW lie that blamed Congress because they cut funding in 1975, the US left in 1973
karynnj
Mar 2016
#137
Many of those foreign policy decisions are actually the only area where I disagree with Bernie.
highoverheadspace
Mar 2016
#12
She's confirmed she knows how to spin things & gets her people to follow suit, that's it.
RiverLover
Mar 2016
#28
Oh, Facty mcFacterson . . . . you forgot, they just make things up the feel good with
pdsimdars
Mar 2016
#108
Mine too as a Hillary supporter relative to Sanders but way better than any GOPr
uponit7771
Mar 2016
#136
That "closeness with banks" & their massive payoff to her, million$ for meaningless speeche$,
RiverLover
Mar 2016
#142
Disagree. I'm pretty sure we will be involved in some military regime change somewhere.
EndElectoral
Mar 2016
#17
Your post and link is so meaningful it should have it's own topic, not part of a thread
EndElectoral
Mar 2016
#48
I can see the crowds chanting. .. with arms raised and lighters lit. . . . beautiful . . .
pdsimdars
Mar 2016
#109
I would much prefer someone new as our next President but that doesn't look likely.
randome
Mar 2016
#42
Tell that to Flint, MI. Or the people without water in the San Joaquin Valley.
RiverLover
Mar 2016
#85
You must have missed the part in social studies about how laws get passed.
Progressive dog
Mar 2016
#182
Are you suggesting that today is no different than the day Obama took office?
brooklynite
Mar 2016
#45
For all those poor souls lost to the neocons wars in Libya, Syria, Iraq, Yemen, Ukraine
highoverheadspace
Mar 2016
#51
I am definitely not right wing. As far as Sarah Palin goes, I didn't know that she came up with that
highoverheadspace
Mar 2016
#124
The OP speaks of one year from now. Obama has been President for 7 years.
Bluenorthwest
Mar 2016
#62
To which I would argue that Clinton plans to continue in the steps of President Obama
brooklynite
Mar 2016
#132
They both serve the same 0.01% corporate interests when it comes to plundering the countries of
highoverheadspace
Mar 2016
#133
It's naive to think any major change will occur with either Dem as President.
LonePirate
Mar 2016
#54
Reality tells me Repubs will maintain their House majority after November. No change is coming.
LonePirate
Mar 2016
#118
I think he will address it directly and find ways to go around those who oppose change whereas
highoverheadspace
Mar 2016
#149
Do you deny that it was Bill that sold us down the river on NAFTA, the deregulation of the media,
highoverheadspace
Mar 2016
#127
Actually, winning is keeping a Republican out of the White House. A Republican never
Agnosticsherbet
Mar 2016
#64
Same thing would happen if Bernie or any other Democrat were elected. The GOP House will block
stevenleser
Mar 2016
#70
Bernie is also a frequent guest at Fox. I guess you need to switch to Hillary now.
stevenleser
Mar 2016
#167
And actually, Bernie has the thinnest hold on the Democrat identity of anyone ever using it. nt
stevenleser
Mar 2016
#173
You've been suckered into one of the talking points. . that Hillary will win if nominated.
pdsimdars
Mar 2016
#93
The lives of those in the ME and Africa and the whole region will still be seen as
polly7
Mar 2016
#102
Just watch the shape shifter speak at AIPAC, GOD that women frightens me...let me call it first!
insta8er
Mar 2016
#121
I really don't care if its a man, woman, black, white or polka dot. Obviously, color and gender do
highoverheadspace
Mar 2016
#139
You are correct and it probably doesn't much matter who is in the White House.
alarimer
Mar 2016
#151