Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)

13. Next you demand her diary. Why aren't we making this demand of all candidates to be able to hear

Reply to TheDormouse (Reply #8)

Mon Mar 21, 2016, 04:54 PM

Mar 2016

anything, read all, regardless, just cause we want it. Ridiculous. Petulant little tantrums demanding something that is not yours and then pissed and accusatory when they do not get their way.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

22 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The real problem with Hillary's speech transcripts [View all] TheDormouse Mar 2016 OP

Hillary is going to do what she always does: Jarqui Mar 2016 #1

Her future transcripts will bear the heading: President Hillary Rodham Clinton.....LOL Trust Buster Mar 2016 #2

I don't give a flyin feck abt her speech transcripts--did u actually read the OP? nt TheDormouse Mar 2016 #7

What is it with you people don't care about the truth? panader0 Mar 2016 #16

Or maybe the story does NOT go away, and only gets more interesting... agracie Mar 2016 #3

The problem is that there's been plenty of time to scrub them. Lizzie Poppet Mar 2016 #4

Watergate did not take Nixon out, the coverup did. Downwinder Mar 2016 #5

Watergate was about public employees obstructing justice. Trust Buster Mar 2016 #9

No don't release the transcripts. There is no need to upaloopa Mar 2016 #6

bcz by refusing to release them ur just giving them more ammunition nt TheDormouse Mar 2016 #8

Yeah, that's what you care about. Republicans having more ammunition....LOL Trust Buster Mar 2016 #10

Next you demand her diary. Why aren't we making this demand of all candidates to be able to hear seabeyond Mar 2016 #13

I don't know what that means but her detractors will always be upaloopa Mar 2016 #14

What Does Hillary Clinton's REFUSAL To Release Her Transcripts And Her AA FIREWALL Have In Common? Segami Mar 2016 #11

She is not stone walling. Transcripts are not yours to demand. You do not get to peek in her diary seabeyond Mar 2016 #12

You could make the same argument abt medical records & tax returns TheDormouse Mar 2016 #17

I want to see what Sanders said while tlaking to staffers. I demand it. They stole data. Give me. seabeyond Mar 2016 #20

Just submit to having your phone lines tapped Dem2 Mar 2016 #15

Some records get stuck on the "transcripts" track cosmicone Mar 2016 #18

Except no one is talking about it except on DU. Thoses pushing here are not going to be won over... anotherproletariat Mar 2016 #19

Well, the New York Times, who endorsed her, said she should release them. Punkingal Mar 2016 #22

It's not a "story." Nobody cares about the speech transcripts. She's beating Bernie DanTex Mar 2016 #21