Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
wow WDIM Mar 2016 #1
That was my response as well--Someone else said Hillary had said she would be TheDormouse Mar 2016 #2
I thought Roe vs Wade was done and settled? NWCorona Mar 2016 #7
She would consider a constitutional amendment WDIM Mar 2016 #8
I don't think she necessarily meant a constitutional amendment TheDormouse Mar 2016 #11
I've heard her mention a constitutional amendment noiretextatique Mar 2016 #72
The adjective "constitutional" means relating to the constitution. athena Mar 2016 #90
Plenty of room to stay right where we are, too. randome Mar 2016 #9
great example of history-free response. this poster *could* be a Millennial, post-90s nashville_brook Mar 2016 #21
It's not any nth-dimensional chess. It's politics. Diplomacy among an enemy in our midst. randome Mar 2016 #28
Why can't we have a candidate who says exactly what she means, directly, without any TheDormouse Mar 2016 #23
Because they're dealing with morons, that's why. randome Mar 2016 #26
because the idiots will be alienated. she left wiggle room to leave it between a woman and her doc bettyellen Mar 2016 #35
Except this isn't the first time she said that. beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #30
And it should be 100% a woman's choice. No exceptions. randome Mar 2016 #33
Abortion rights should NEVER be put on the table. beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #36
I don't even think it's a signal, just political blather. bettyellen said it best above. randome Mar 2016 #40
Why go there at all when we're under attack in the states? beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #43
You're absolutely right. nt TheDormouse Mar 2016 #55
sometimes you just gotta stand on principles (if you have any) bbgrunt Mar 2016 #63
You nailed it! noiretextatique Mar 2016 #77
Nothing she does is a big deal noiretextatique Mar 2016 #75
Precisely. beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #83
Crucified by whom, the far left? Fumesucker Mar 2016 #48
shhh ... Bernie Sanders nt TheDormouse Mar 2016 #80
She's offered this up a few times noiretextatique Mar 2016 #74
So she's lying about being open to reproductive rights restrictions? Doctor_J Mar 2016 #37
It's not a lie, it's political blather. randome Mar 2016 #41
So she says she's OK with curbing reproductive rights, but she's really not Doctor_J Mar 2016 #44
You're not going to get anywhere. revbones Mar 2016 #53
Princess Weathervane's Ostrich Army. Lizzie Poppet Mar 2016 #58
I like that one. Chan790 Mar 2016 #70
Come on randome, on your view she is lying, plain and simple. Vattel Mar 2016 #59
The headline is a lie. It's a quote without the use of quotation marks. randome Mar 2016 #76
fair enough Vattel Mar 2016 #81
summary = a brief statement that presents the main points in a concise form TheDormouse Mar 2016 #82
so, how would you write the thread title? TheDormouse Mar 2016 #85
But but but Hillary is all about women's rights coyote Mar 2016 #73
In before the accusations that it wasn't what she meant or it was out of context Matt_in_STL Mar 2016 #3
She CLEARLY meant Republican obstruction! Lizzie Poppet Mar 2016 #14
And also in before accusations of "sexism" and irrational "hate." Arugula Latte Mar 2016 #20
As a woman who deals with preemies and special needs issues... IdaBriggs Mar 2016 #4
It's a dangerous slippery slope argument to be open to compromise on this. AtomicKitten Mar 2016 #51
The life and health of the mother. Would that include just not wanting to be pregnant? Tierra_y_Libertad Mar 2016 #5
WOW! NWCorona Mar 2016 #6
anyone who thinks HRC is solid on abortion needs to get educated. nashville_brook Mar 2016 #10
some of us aren't old enough to have been paying attention then nt TheDormouse Mar 2016 #12
books? internet? if you're interested in reproductive rights, it only takes a few hours to nashville_brook Mar 2016 #16
Legal, safe, and rare loyalsister Mar 2016 #49
And mind you, this isn't some ancient embarrassment dredged up from the distant past. Lizzie Poppet Mar 2016 #13
bcz there's a special place in Hell for women who don't support other women TheDormouse Mar 2016 #15
Yep. Lizzie Poppet Mar 2016 #17
Worst Presumed "Democratic" Nominee EVER. Arugula Latte Mar 2016 #18
This!^^^^^^10000! 2banon Mar 2016 #27
Clinton is going to betray EVERYONE who supports her now, on multiple issues! Peace Patriot Mar 2016 #19
People who want potable water should be on that list. noamnety Mar 2016 #46
I, for one, welcome the all wise Hillary selling off my personal control over my own body. Zorra Mar 2016 #22
is that a younger Kasich? nt TheDormouse Mar 2016 #24
I can't tell. Misogynist Republican racist homphobes all look the same to me. nt Zorra Mar 2016 #29
lol nt TheDormouse Mar 2016 #32
Well, I guess if it's good enough for Planned Parenthood.....? 2banon Mar 2016 #25
Nice of her to advertise... Ino Mar 2016 #31
And the ideological gap between her and the republicans grows ever smaller Doctor_J Mar 2016 #34
Women's rights, uh-huh. Thanks, Hill. senz Mar 2016 #38
Hillary is the same as she's always been. Third Way. Blue Dog Democrat. Zen Democrat Mar 2016 #39
When will politicians give up gynecology as a hobby? Vinca Mar 2016 #42
She can't be trusted. On anything. CharlotteVale Mar 2016 #45
Why aren't reproductive rights non-negotiable for her? TheDormouse Mar 2016 #47
She's already starting to inch her way back to the center davidn3600 Mar 2016 #50
She's already starting to inch her way back to the DJ13 Mar 2016 #52
but this interview was 6 months ago nt TheDormouse Mar 2016 #56
So, do tell. ChairmanAgnostic Mar 2016 #61
She's never moved...this was 6 months ago noiretextatique Mar 2016 #79
Welp... ANYONE care to defend this shit? AzDar Mar 2016 #54
So far we got a 'politcal theater' excuse and crickets. NT. Juicy_Bellows Mar 2016 #60
Not even a page of Bettie Mar 2016 #66
It's actually brilliant. athena Mar 2016 #89
And that is a huge Bjornsdotter Mar 2016 #57
Wait til she weighs in on slavery, immigration, and allowing Muslims here. ChairmanAgnostic Mar 2016 #62
This proves she can't be trusted to defend choice. Ken Burch Mar 2016 #64
Someone here called it just political "blather" sadoldgirl Mar 2016 #65
If this is "blather" how are we supposed to know ... surrealAmerican Mar 2016 #68
Throwing women's rights under the bus! peace13 Mar 2016 #67
That's the problem with having no real convictions beyond winning. Marr Mar 2016 #69
Everyone's big argument for Hillary is SCOTUS - TBF Mar 2016 #71
Yup, Roe v Wade is already fragile. Hillary can't be trusted to keep it safe nt riderinthestorm Mar 2016 #78
Plenty of women oppose a woman's right to choose - Republicans, closeupready Mar 2016 #84
during a debate, they should play that tape & ask Hillary TheDormouse Mar 2016 #86
How grand of her. pdsimdars Mar 2016 #87
This message was self-deleted by its author athena Mar 2016 #88
Well, I guess we should congratulate her. She hasn't flip flopped. Zira Mar 2016 #91
and now she's posturing about being the champion of abortion rights TheDormouse Mar 2016 #92
#WhichHillary? I admit to having no damn idea. nt nc4bo Mar 2016 #93
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hillary: I could compromi...»Reply #32