Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ZombieHorde

(29,047 posts)
232. Her comments in the interview were anti-Trump.
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 05:37 PM
Mar 2016

She never said Trump might be better for America than HRC.

shameful comment Botany Mar 2016 #1
I see nothing "shameful" about her comment. nt ladjf Mar 2016 #54
just like Ralph Nader's that there was no real difference between Al Gore and w bush comment? Botany Mar 2016 #67
It was your use of the word "shameful" that I disagreed with. ladjf Mar 2016 #71
Ah partisans. nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #73
Her quote is disgusting Sheepshank Mar 2016 #96
So you disagree that trump is dangerous nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #108
that is totally off point- she was smiling when talking about the "things will really explode" bettyellen Mar 2016 #115
No, it is not off point nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #119
Yes, he is dangerous. No to bringing on a revolution where "things will really explode" bettyellen Mar 2016 #136
Well at least you agree with her that he is dangerous nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #137
she went totally off script, Bernie does not agree with her about "things will really explode" bettyellen Mar 2016 #157
Yes. This will not play well in America. Hortensis Mar 2016 #209
Very likely. But now he needs to come out and clear the air robbedvoter Mar 2016 #218
Sarandon caught fawning over trump with her statement on Chris Hayes Sheepshank Mar 2016 #143
Because in not normal reading we call that fawning nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #146
Right. Remember she backed Nader in 2000, with him hook, line and sinker . . . brush Mar 2016 #215
Me either. KPN Mar 2016 #94
I disagree. It is shameful riversedge Mar 2016 #263
Don't you all understand the phrase, "some people?" Bohunk68 Mar 2016 #204
she would not say herself where she stood. but her smiling and laughing was bad enough. bettyellen Mar 2016 #223
electing Trump will make things explode larkrake Mar 2016 #206
What's Really Shameful Progressive Avenger Mar 2016 #219
Honest comment. Actually I agree with her. peacebird Mar 2016 #2
Trump thumping is NOT ALLOWED. Agschmid Mar 2016 #5
How is this Trump pumping? The concept that Trump would be so horrible that he would destroy the Attorney in Texas Mar 2016 #39
It's not panic, it's sheer frustration with people that think Trump would be better than Clinton. Agschmid Mar 2016 #48
Susan Sarandon did not say Trump would be better than Clinton. She said Trump would be so bad that Attorney in Texas Mar 2016 #57
The republican establishment seems to be doing just fine as Trump with the nominee. Agschmid Mar 2016 #58
So do you agree that Trump is dangerous or not? nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #66
Yes Trump is dangerous... for liberals. Agschmid Mar 2016 #70
You mist be watching another race nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #77
The R's split all the time, but guess what... They actually vote for the candidate. Agschmid Mar 2016 #80
That is why the business wing is considering nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #83
Yeah we don't hate the left, we are the left. Agschmid Mar 2016 #89
Clinton is center right nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #92
Your bias is showing. Agschmid Mar 2016 #141
Actually my masters degree is showing nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #147
No that's bias. Agschmid Mar 2016 #148
Understanding political systems is bias? nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #151
I have yet to personally insult you... Yet that's all you've got for me. Agschmid Mar 2016 #153
You have nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #154
Can you get news on your computer? If so, you may want to look into what Mitt Romney is up to these Attorney in Texas Mar 2016 #75
The only thing that worries me flobee1 Mar 2016 #95
Agreed. A Trump presidency would destroy a lot more than just the status quo establishment Attorney in Texas Mar 2016 #98
I disagree with her and you on that matter. lovemydog Mar 2016 #261
Soros!!11 Starry Messenger Mar 2016 #11
Nader/Trump fans coming out of the woodwork. "not a dimes worth of difference"? redstateblues Mar 2016 #12
I have not heard anyone suggest that there is "not a dimes worth of difference." Hillary is 100% Attorney in Texas Mar 2016 #44
that comment goes to Sarandon's credibility as a Nader follower and to neo-Naderites redstateblues Mar 2016 #162
"Hillary is 100% status quo" (Obama = the status quo?) "and Trump is 100% change" (the anti-Obama?). pampango Mar 2016 #166
FYI: that quote refers to Gore/ Republicans and Clinton/ Republicans... bettyellen Mar 2016 #167
You ignore the fact that most of the folks who may not vote for Hillary KPN Mar 2016 #114
Not the Nader nonsense again. ZZZZzzzzzzz. merrily Mar 2016 #183
Better luck next time Renew Deal Mar 2016 #27
Why am I not surprised to see you of all people say this? hrmjustin Mar 2016 #102
That certainly shows how little you care about issues BainsBane Mar 2016 #200
Ugh. zappaman Mar 2016 #3
Can we stop pretending that people who prefer Trump to Clinton are progressives? DanTex Mar 2016 #4
She isn't saying that she prefers Trump's policies Goblinmonger Mar 2016 #180
Which, of course, is insane. Even she actually believes it, it's no excuse for being pro-Trump. DanTex Mar 2016 #182
Her comments in the interview in the link are in no way pro-Trump. ZombieHorde Mar 2016 #231
Did I miss something? Does Trump have actual, well-thought-out policies? LastLiberal in PalmSprings Mar 2016 #187
That's the kind of moronic mindset that brought us Bush. Beacool Mar 2016 #195
Dan Savage nailed it... Agschmid Mar 2016 #6
That's fine. RandySF Mar 2016 #8
Rahm and DWS have a D next to their names. dirtydickcheney Mar 2016 #60
So does Clinton, even as she adopts neocon war policies. ChairmanAgnostic Mar 2016 #84
really bizarre comment shireen Mar 2016 #7
No she is saying she wants a revolution, no matter how we get it, or what the cost is. Agschmid Mar 2016 #9
She overstated it, but has a valid point. Complacency keeps the corrupt status quo in place Armstead Mar 2016 #52
The headline is a lie, she never said that. beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #10
read what she says. Not surprising from a Naderite redstateblues Mar 2016 #13
I did she never said what the op implies. beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #14
What she wants RandySF Mar 2016 #15
You can read her mind now? If not you're just making up shit. beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #16
. RandySF Mar 2016 #19
Some people do feel that way, where does she say she does? beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #22
"some people" RandySF Mar 2016 #25
Apparently you did since you're using their tactics of putting words in people's mouths. beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #29
I'm not calling her a witch, I'm calling her wrong. RandySF Mar 2016 #34
Obfuscate much? beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #37
Stupidity knows no gender RandySF Mar 2016 #65
Except she never said what you're attributing to her. beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #72
You are lying and if you think you are not nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #86
See reply #118 nt LAS14 Mar 2016 #132
Nuance is hard. nt riderinthestorm Mar 2016 #30
Yep and facts are even harder. beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #36
Yup, and the stronger they are, the harder they try to swat them down nt riderinthestorm Mar 2016 #40
It is not just women :-) nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #41
Yep look at what they're doing to minorities who support Bernie. beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #43
It is starting to back fire though nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #47
They just don't see it, and when they don't turn out to support Hillary in the ge they'll wonder why beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #49
Yes, people are tired of it. nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #56
Yup, find the witch, and send her to that cold, dark ring of hell where closeupready Mar 2016 #121
Feminists who don't support Hillary are called vile names by so-called liberals. beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #125
Wow, Bernie should renounce her endorsement asap! MoonRiver Mar 2016 #17
Headlines aside, Bernie should denounce this fast. Stuff should stick to him just like it does HC. Jitter65 Mar 2016 #26
The first I've heard of this was on DU. MoonRiver Mar 2016 #32
Yup, that be Clinton (and Trump) nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #42
Your right angrychair Mar 2016 #97
The excerpt shows the headline is a lie. And, BTW, she's right that a Trump presidency would Vote2016 Mar 2016 #18
She means if Trump gets in the country will unite against him. Cheese Sandwich Mar 2016 #20
What makes you think people would revolt? Agschmid Mar 2016 #55
What makes you think liberals would support a right wing Trump agenda? Cheese Sandwich Mar 2016 #59
They won't, but when you win and hold both houses of congress and appoint SC nominees. Agschmid Mar 2016 #61
Sure it does. If Trump tries to take us into a war we'll have millions of people in the streets. Cheese Sandwich Mar 2016 #64
So when Bush tried to take us to war, and we had people protesting everywhere... Agschmid Mar 2016 #76
We tried to stop it but too many liberal Senators supported him Cheese Sandwich Mar 2016 #79
And you think we will be able to stop a President Trump? Agschmid Mar 2016 #82
We might be able to. If Hillary takes us to war, or cuts social security, half of DU will cheer. Cheese Sandwich Mar 2016 #87
If we go to war or cuts SS- your big concern is how DUers react? WTFinfF? bettyellen Mar 2016 #124
No. DU is just an example of a group of liberals. Cheese Sandwich Mar 2016 #130
Yeah, just like we did in 2002. Beacool Mar 2016 #199
That's a silly assumption. Beacool Mar 2016 #197
Dishonest headline nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #21
It's not dishonest. It says "might." LAS14 Mar 2016 #118
You disagree that Trump is dangerous? nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #120
No. I don't disagree. But I think precipitating... LAS14 Mar 2016 #144
Watch the full interview nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #145
So... For the emoprog left Blue_Tires Mar 2016 #23
What a ridiculous thing to say mcar Mar 2016 #24
unbelievable. I've always been a fan but this is crazy MariaThinks Mar 2016 #28
The OP is false nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #46
i believe you. It surprised me MariaThinks Mar 2016 #140
She seems to have slipped a cog somewhere. cwydro Mar 2016 #31
By saying that trump is so dangerous. nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #62
I do agree Trump is dangerous. cwydro Mar 2016 #63
Well either you jumped the shark with her nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #68
I'll check it out later nadin. cwydro Mar 2016 #100
Okie dokie nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #112
Exactly BuddhaGirl Mar 2016 #142
I have lost the last shred of respect that I once had for this woman ... salinsky Mar 2016 #33
She's lost it! Firebrand Gary Mar 2016 #35
Heighten the contradictions! alcibiades_mystery Mar 2016 #38
Except that the OP is wrong and that is not what she said nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #50
That is (almost exactly) what she said. See response #118 nt LAS14 Mar 2016 #123
But that is not what she said nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #126
Voting for Hillary is the antidote to Ramadi, Iraq? Never learn, indeed! merrily Mar 2016 #51
MSNBC is paying Hayes to shill for establishment Democrats, neither Sanders nor Trump. merrily Mar 2016 #45
... SidDithers Mar 2016 #53
She said no such thing ibegurpard Mar 2016 #69
Another "naderite" who falsely leftynyc Mar 2016 #74
She said no such thing. nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #81
Cost "my" party? leftynyc Mar 2016 #99
I am a decline to state voter nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #116
See response #118. What is your response? nt LAS14 Mar 2016 #129
Prolly des want a cracker I suppose nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #134
OP is telling the truth. See response #118 - nt LAS14 Mar 2016 #127
Prolly want a cracker nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #128
quite frankly, you sit here DemonGoddess Mar 2016 #244
I became to a decline to state voter in 2011 nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #245
Now, now, now Uponthegears Mar 2016 #109
You are wrong-Nader did give us Bush Gothmog Mar 2016 #149
Oh yea Uponthegears Mar 2016 #176
I volunteer in voter protection efforts for DNC and state party Gothmog Mar 2016 #192
Where were you in 2000? Uponthegears Mar 2016 #193
"if Nader voters had voted against their convictions"???? One of the 99 Mar 2016 #198
D-I-V-E-R-S-I-O-N Uponthegears Mar 2016 #201
Trying to rewrite history is sad Gothmog Mar 2016 #207
Friend Uponthegears Mar 2016 #212
Denial is not just a river in Africa Gothmog Mar 2016 #222
Oh my Uponthegears Mar 2016 #229
You are welcome to your own opinion but not to your own facts Gothmog Mar 2016 #236
I live in FL mcar Mar 2016 #237
I agree with your sentiment Gothmog Mar 2016 #238
Now I am starting to Uponthegears Mar 2016 #239
I love the fact that you are unable to deal with the facts presented Gothmog Mar 2016 #241
Did you ever consider Uponthegears Mar 2016 #246
Again, the fact is that Nader is an idiot who gave us Bush, citizens united and the Shelby county Gothmog Mar 2016 #250
Again, the fact is that the DNC/DLC abandoning PoC gave us Bush, Citizens United and Shelby County Uponthegears Mar 2016 #257
You can keep repeating yourself Uponthegears Mar 2016 #258
Your lack of understanding of causation is amusing Gothmog Mar 2016 #259
I don't deny ANY of those facts Uponthegears Mar 2016 #260
Yes if they have no chance of winning One of the 99 Mar 2016 #251
Headed to Florida on December 12 when the SCOTUS stopped the recount Gothmog Mar 2016 #205
Nader alone didn't give us Bush. One of the 99 Mar 2016 #196
Nader cost Gore two to five times the number of votes than he cost Bush Gothmog Mar 2016 #202
As I said, Nader was a contributing factor One of the 99 Mar 2016 #252
Nader's stupidity and arrogance was sufficient in and of itself the give Bush the election Gothmog Mar 2016 #254
The DNC/DLC's pandering to middle-right suburbanites was sufficient Uponthegears Mar 2016 #256
Agreed Uponthegears Mar 2016 #211
"Some people think...." Does not equal "Trump might be better for America". Tierra_y_Libertad Mar 2016 #78
She said more than that. See reply #118. nt LAS14 Mar 2016 #135
I just watched the video. That's not what she said at all. polly7 Mar 2016 #85
FYI -- jury results Amaril Mar 2016 #88
Jury results B2G Mar 2016 #90
I haven't concluded anything. Against the odds, I'm still pulling for Bernie. Jarqui Mar 2016 #91
The full interview is online nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #93
I saw the whole interview last night Jarqui Mar 2016 #101
Yup nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #111
Sarandon also supporter Nader who gave us Bush Gothmog Mar 2016 #103
Sorry Goth Uponthegears Mar 2016 #117
Your analysis is totally wrong and sad. Gothmog Mar 2016 #152
Nader Denialism Lives!! redstateblues Mar 2016 #168
See post #176 Uponthegears Mar 2016 #177
So the tens of thousands of conservadems nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #122
This is the goal of the bernie or bust faction Gothmog Mar 2016 #159
As I said. It is never the fault of the party nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #163
She is disgusting. nt LexVegas Mar 2016 #104
Evidence of the utter insanity of a small (I hope)... LAS14 Mar 2016 #105
Sanders should be pushed on whether she speaks for him. hrmjustin Mar 2016 #106
bernies opinions of trump are public and well documented. restorefreedom Mar 2016 #225
Stupid, dangerous foolish thinking. DCBob Mar 2016 #107
Just watched it again to be sure I hadn't missed what you claim. polly7 Mar 2016 #110
she smiled and chuckled after saying "things will really explode." she just fucked Sanders. bettyellen Mar 2016 #133
Wow. polly7 Mar 2016 #150
Not at all, just amazed Sanders #1 surrogate would go so off script. I bet Bernie is angry. bettyellen Mar 2016 #155
No, you sound really, really pissed. polly7 Mar 2016 #161
LOL, you are imagining things. Like this conversation being about the "sensible" things she said. bettyellen Mar 2016 #164
I listened twice. I'm not imagining anything. polly7 Mar 2016 #165
It is about an interview where she smiled and laughed while saying "things will really explode" bettyellen Mar 2016 #169
Uh yeah ........... I know what it's about. polly7 Mar 2016 #171
Finally acknowledging. Now does Bernie agree that the revolution will come because of Trump? bettyellen Mar 2016 #173
I finally acknowledged your meme of the day is another ugly "shitty" smear. polly7 Mar 2016 #174
Sarandon owns it. Smiling while talking about explosions that lead to revolution... bettyellen Mar 2016 #175
She does own it ....... proudly. polly7 Mar 2016 #178
Thank god Bernie has more sense than she does! I love Bernie, but not his "burn it down" fringe. bettyellen Mar 2016 #179
LOL! Riiiiiiiight. nt. polly7 Mar 2016 #181
There is more than a dimes worth of difference between Sanders and Sarandon. bettyellen Mar 2016 #184
Waaay too much hate - that's not good for you. polly7 Mar 2016 #185
You are imagining things that are not there, Polly. I don't hate morons like Sarandon. bettyellen Mar 2016 #188
Here, watch this .... it will make you feel better: polly7 Mar 2016 #189
I'm already feeling awesome! If there is anything we haven't heard before in that speech bettyellen Mar 2016 #190
You're very welcome. polly7 Mar 2016 #191
"things will really explode" She is writing those attack ads all by herself. bettyellen Mar 2016 #113
Who cares what she thinks? SHRED Mar 2016 #131
She is his most famous and vocal supporter, a surrogate on the trail. bettyellen Mar 2016 #170
What Dan Savage said LyndaG Mar 2016 #138
Bernie or Bust? HughLefty1 Mar 2016 #139
Susan S has joined the #BernieorBust folks. riversedge Mar 2016 #156
she is going to being a lot of eyes to that "movement" and it's not good for Sanders. bettyellen Mar 2016 #160
Sure he will say that if he says riversedge Mar 2016 #228
She should retract what I would hope was said mockingly, nothing would justify such a vote AuntPatsy Mar 2016 #158
If this doesn't give Hillary people some pause, then they're whistling past the graveyard. Jester Messiah Mar 2016 #172
I've been saying this myself. She isn't saying she would vote for Trump and she isn't saying he Nanjeanne Mar 2016 #186
I had no problem with Sarandon endorsing Sanders, it was her prerogative. Beacool Mar 2016 #194
What happened to Chris Hayes? It's like he's dead now. What happened to the bright, alive spirit? senz Mar 2016 #203
I read the article and comments. Looking at it, it seems what she said is mischaracterized. Xyzse Mar 2016 #208
How nice of a filthy rich shill for the far right to announce how little my rights mean BainsBane Mar 2016 #210
You oppose filthy rich far-right shills and yet support Hillary? senz Mar 2016 #214
Given that you obviously haven't taken the time to acquaint BainsBane Mar 2016 #216
OK this is way OTT - she is not standing with Trump. She is A Nanjeanne Mar 2016 #220
Sarandon is a selfish, privileged twit. yardwork Mar 2016 #213
I disagree strongly. She is very wrong on this issue, and not thinking it thru. Jackie Wilson Said Mar 2016 #227
She is a fool. n/t Lucinda Mar 2016 #217
Lots of people see things this way... sorry (not sorry) if that hurts anyone's feelings. AzDar Mar 2016 #221
It's just that RandySF Mar 2016 #224
Which is why you should vote for Bernie... AzDar Mar 2016 #230
whatever she meant or didnt mean... restorefreedom Mar 2016 #226
Her comments in the interview were anti-Trump. ZombieHorde Mar 2016 #232
Has the Bernie campaign come out against her statement? FloridaBlues Mar 2016 #233
This thread should be used for the house cleaning. joshcryer Mar 2016 #234
Holding on to status quo for 1% or destroy democracy for 1%.... kgnu_fan Mar 2016 #235
She has "tweeted" that *LOL* she will not vote for Trump. So that is something. bettyellen Mar 2016 #240
No kidding RandySF Mar 2016 #242
Oh yeah, I think she is a sour grapes voter who loved Edwards even if worked on Wall Street bettyellen Mar 2016 #243
OFFS beedle Mar 2016 #247
Enemy at the Gate vs. the Traitor within.... JPnoodleman Mar 2016 #248
There is no other response to Sarandon's comments other than horror and disgust. forjusticethunders Mar 2016 #249
People never learn workinclasszero Mar 2016 #253
Here's a rundown of how it went wrong forjusticethunders Mar 2016 #255
Ive said from day one workinclasszero Mar 2016 #262
She's a celebrity like Donald Trump, pay no attention.....n/t blueintelligentsia Mar 2016 #264
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Susan Sarandon: Trump Mig...»Reply #232