2016 Postmortem

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)

22. Bizarre, isn't it?

Wed Mar 30, 2016, 06:18 PM

Mar 2016

This almost manic need to slime Bernie and his supporters, maybe it just built up during all those months when he had to pretend to support him.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

48 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Bernie Sanders reportedly left off D.C. primary ballot after Democratic Party error [View all] speaktruthtopower Mar 2016 OP

"Error". Reminds me of Bartop's First Law n/t arcane1 Mar 2016 #1

Yeah...."mistake".... (nt) jeff47 Mar 2016 #2

it's a CONSPIRACY OMG!!!! David Brock strikes AGAIN!!!! geek tragedy Mar 2016 #10

No conspiracy, just another calculated "error". We're getting use to them .nt Snotcicles Mar 2016 #12

an error that was found months before the primary, will be fixed, geek tragedy Mar 2016 #13

Just chalk it up with all the rest. nt Snotcicles Mar 2016 #14

everything is a grand conspiracy, Bernie is actually geek tragedy Mar 2016 #15

That is so silly. nt Snotcicles Mar 2016 #16

I missed a decimal point? nt geek tragedy Mar 2016 #17

You should go undercover again. Oddly, you made more sense then. cui bono Mar 2016 #19

Bizarre, isn't it? beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #22

You know, some people would call that trolling. cui bono Mar 2016 #39

Why yes they would! beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #41

Well you can't have all your loyal players sitting on the bench. nt Snotcicles Mar 2016 #44

YUP! KPN Mar 2016 #48

When mistakes hurt both candidates, I'll consider them honest mistakes. jeff47 Mar 2016 #32

Bernie Sanders will be on the DC ballot and will suffer zero harm. geek tragedy Mar 2016 #33

So point me to the same sort of mistakes by the party that affected Clinton. jeff47 Mar 2016 #34

this won't affect Sanders, he'll be on the ballot. geek tragedy Mar 2016 #35

And it's yet another "mistake" that only affects him. jeff47 Mar 2016 #36

no, it doesn't affect him, he won't be left off the ballot. geek tragedy Mar 2016 #38

That article was pretty thin. I fully expect Bernie to be on the DC ballot. morningfog Mar 2016 #3

The Washington Times is pretty thin ... Impedimentus Mar 2016 #5

Moonie Times article cited to support conspiracy theory du jour nt geek tragedy Mar 2016 #4

Here's the original report. arcane1 Mar 2016 #6

almost exactly the same article Viva_La_Revolution Mar 2016 #11

'according to a report by WRC-TV, the local NBC affiliate,' elleng Mar 2016 #7

+ 10. Eom Karma13612 Mar 2016 #8

Washington Times!!! DanTex Mar 2016 #9

Yeah, that must completely discredit it right? revbones Mar 2016 #26

Not in your mind of course. Obviously you're ecstatic when you see Murdoch stuff posted. DanTex Mar 2016 #27

Nope, just when hypocrisy is soooo obvious. revbones Mar 2016 #28

I think you mean "yes". You're chuckling. Like I said, kudos. Far lefties can be suckers. DanTex Mar 2016 #31

If anyone wants to check this out, it should be fairly easy to do. Vinca Mar 2016 #18

It was the Democratic Party that screwed up not Sanders Chezboo Mar 2016 #20

Who are we talking about when we say DC Democratic Party? jwirr Mar 2016 #25

Here: elleng Mar 2016 #37

Thanks, elleng... MrMickeysMom Mar 2016 #42

You're welcome, Mom. elleng Mar 2016 #46

Bump that list against the list of commitments by superdelegates ... JustABozoOnThisBus Mar 2016 #47

Fuck the corrupt in the beltway Democrats jfern Mar 2016 #21

+1 dana_b Mar 2016 #40

This is the Washington TIMES WhiteTara Mar 2016 #23

Read the thread. Wilms Mar 2016 #24

D.C. party officials called the problem a minor administrative dispute. WhiteTara Mar 2016 #29

I'm fine. I read the thread before blargling about the Unwashed Times. n/t Wilms Mar 2016 #30

Is that snark? WhiteTara Mar 2016 #43

I thought UnWashed Times was pretty good. Wilms Mar 2016 #45