Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TheDormouse

(1,168 posts)
2. Is there an ethical case to be made
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 02:31 PM
Mar 2016
http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow/watch/clinton-offers-transparency-on-foundation-655496771563

RACHEL MADDOW: Let me ask you one-- last question. Which I'm asking in part because we're here in New York. Which is-- the headquarters of The Clinton Foundation, and The Clinton Global Initiative. Is there a case to be made, an ethical case to be made that The Clinton Foundation and the global initiative should essentially be wound down as a family foundation while you run for president?

I ask that because I think about the-- the good works, the good charitable works that The Clinton Foundation has done. But the way that some of that work gets done is by soliciting donations from people in this country, from people around the world, from organizations around the world.

I think it is not unreasonable to suspect that people may give donations to The Clinton Foundation hoping that they will favorably influence your opinion toward them, as a presidential candidate, or eventually as president if you're elected. Is there an ethical concern there that there should be essentially-- a split between you and your family, (COUGH) and-- and-- and this foundation, that has done good work? But now you're in a different position-- with regard to potential donors.

HILLARY CLINTON : Well, look, I-- I think that-- the work that it's done has been extraordinary. And I give the credit to my husband and my daughter, because I haven't been involved-- for that long. And, you know, when I look at what they've accomplished, and what they've been able to amplify in terms of saving lives-- by getting the price of drugs for HIV/AIDS down in sub-Saharan Africa.

It's quite astonishing. And I would hate to lose that creativity, that imagination, that-- extraordinary flexibility. So, I think the answer is transparency. And there is no doubt that there will be-- complete transparency about-- donations.

But when you have hundreds of thousands of people who are donating-- as they do-- I think that-- the best-- answer for that is what we have been doing for the last several years. And that is-- to be transparent about it. And let-- you know, let voters and others make their judgment.
http://www.newsweek.com/hillary-clinton-full-transcript-rachel-maddow-interview-442486?
Again, is Bill Clinton running to become President? MineralMan Mar 2016 #1
Is there an ethical case to be made TheDormouse Mar 2016 #2
Hillary Clinton's definition of transparency... dchill Mar 2016 #5
That article is about Bill Clinton's administration. MineralMan Mar 2016 #11
"No charges were brought" = unable to distinguish between illegal vs unethical nt TheDormouse Mar 2016 #18
Not at all. I know the difference. MineralMan Mar 2016 #19
The way he's been showing up at polling places and shaking hands I'm beginning to wonder... think Mar 2016 #3
He's campaigning for his spouse, just like MineralMan Mar 2016 #7
Again, the Clintons are a package. Avalux Mar 2016 #8
Well, since he was President for two terms, I suppose MineralMan Mar 2016 #12
LOL seriously? The two of them are a business. n/t Avalux Mar 2016 #13
IMO, this is his way of getting another term... dchill Mar 2016 #9
I'll put him down as an influential insider. Hey, a 2 for 1! Remember the package? WhaTHellsgoingonhere Mar 2016 #10
I see. I suppose every President's spouse talks MineralMan Mar 2016 #14
In a way, yes. nichomachus Mar 2016 #23
In case you didnt notice, Hillary is a woman and is therefore held Jackie Wilson Said Mar 2016 #26
Upon reading the OP ... 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2016 #30
Hi-dollar B&B Downwinder Mar 2016 #4
1997, huh. Old school right-wing smears... DanTex Mar 2016 #6
Two-decade old Right-Wing smears MineralMan Mar 2016 #17
This is why you cannot understand TheDormouse Mar 2016 #21
And when she is the Democratic nominee, will MineralMan Mar 2016 #22
Travel Office! Whitewater!!... SidDithers Mar 2016 #15
These are allegations & stories? one_voice Mar 2016 #16
Yabbut, Clinton...evil...bad...must destroy... MineralMan Mar 2016 #20
Did TheDormouse Mar 2016 #24
GOP is what this is. Jackie Wilson Said Mar 2016 #27
RW water from 1997? No thanks. JoePhilly Mar 2016 #25
+1 wildeyed Mar 2016 #31
Better a bedroom than the middle class pbmus Mar 2016 #28
Really? MFM008 Mar 2016 #29
Disgusting FreakinDJ Mar 2016 #32
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»When the Lincoln Bedroom ...»Reply #2