Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Dem2

(8,168 posts)
7. Huh?
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 11:40 PM
Apr 2016

1. It wasn't equal time, but it never is, her arguments in the time she did use weren't persuasive to me.

2. "So you believe that because they are all supporting Hillary, they won't work with Bernie? " No, that's irrelevant. They can both accomplish likely similar things is what I agree to.

3. "That's what you think? " Nope.

4. "Because basically that what he said and all he said. We will have a democratic President and his own party won't work with him. Really? " Still no and irrelevant.

Anybody who claims no bias is a liar. I claim to like both candidates, because I do. In my humble opinion, Barney made a better case in their mini-debate. You are free to have a different opinion.

he's not retired, he's a bank lobbiest now Viva_La_Revolution Apr 2016 #1
Payoff for Dodd Frank legislation? nt Snotcicles Apr 2016 #11
He really won the argument IMO Dem2 Apr 2016 #2
Definitely...... daleanime Apr 2016 #3
Agreed Dem2 Apr 2016 #4
Money was does.... daleanime Apr 2016 #5
What argument? I heard blustering. BTW, 3x the time - poor Nina! snowy owl Apr 2016 #6
Huh? Dem2 Apr 2016 #7
Persuasive to you? I didn't think it would be. snowy owl Apr 2016 #9
Go Bernie liberal from boston Apr 2016 #12
Go Bernie liberal from boston Apr 2016 #13
the Financial Services Committee was "The Barney Show" zazen Apr 2016 #8
I noticed his "self-aggrandizement" a long time ago. snowy owl Apr 2016 #10
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Barney Franks blusters ag...»Reply #7