Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

paulthompson

(2,398 posts)
9. No early voting
Tue Apr 12, 2016, 08:22 PM
Apr 2016

And New York plus four out of five states the next week allow no early voting. That's a big boost to Sanders, since Clinton does very well with early voting. It allows for a late swing.

Let's say Sanders does well at Thursday's debate. In a state like Florida, by the time the debate in Miami happened, 80% had voted already, so his performance didn't matter much. In New York, it'll be close to 0% voted already (there's a small number of absentee voters). Oh, and Sanders lost early voters in Florida by about 35 points, but lost election day votes by about 12 points. In state after state, he gets a late swing in his direction. That will be amplified with no early voting.

Yep I take 538 with a pinch of salt they are on the Clinton dole GeorgiaPeanuts Apr 2016 #1
They are not, they just have a methodology that isn't perfect... pantsonfire Apr 2016 #2
Michigan's last competitive Presidential Primary was 1992 Trenzalore Apr 2016 #26
oops jcgoldie Apr 2016 #14
Who did 538 consult to unskew Michigan GeorgiaPeanuts Apr 2016 #22
I think you have your slogan jcgoldie Apr 2016 #23
That's embarrassing. ;) reformist2 Apr 2016 #3
Raises hope for whom?? nt BreakfastClub Apr 2016 #4
Turnout - motivation - is everything. JackRiddler Apr 2016 #5
I >99% agree with you, MoE, last week many people decide who to vote for.... pantsonfire Apr 2016 #6
Open primary vs closed primary. Apples and oranges Tarc Apr 2016 #7
Just google Michigan Open Primary.....n/t pantsonfire Apr 2016 #16
The Independents in Michigan caused that. DCBob Apr 2016 #8
No early voting paulthompson Apr 2016 #9
Wont matter... she already has big lead with regular LVs. DCBob Apr 2016 #11
Michigan was an open primary. NuclearDem Apr 2016 #10
Pollsters know about these things jfern Apr 2016 #13
Many of the polls way underestimated Adrahil Apr 2016 #19
People self indentified independents or registered independents? jfern Apr 2016 #25
Self-identified Adrahil Apr 2016 #30
Closed primaries have more self identified independents who are registered as Democrats jfern Apr 2016 #31
I'd agree with that. Adrahil Apr 2016 #33
I wonder if it was greater than 99.9% or 99.99%. Bernie narrowly winning NY would be less shocking jfern Apr 2016 #12
I was thinking Lysol percentage...so 99.99. n/t pantsonfire Apr 2016 #15
Woo-hoo, slam dunk for Bernie!!! pdsimdars Apr 2016 #17
Michigan was an open primary Adrahil Apr 2016 #18
Since then? What about all the other demographics? n/t pantsonfire Apr 2016 #20
The problem for Bernie jcgoldie Apr 2016 #21
He needs to win in NY and win about 56.5% from there to tie... pantsonfire Apr 2016 #24
Open primary Michigan. Closed in NY with no chance of changing affiliation. Buzz Clik Apr 2016 #27
Hillary was supposed to win Wisconsin as well Csainvestor Apr 2016 #28
yeah and that changed dramatically in the last week... pantsonfire Apr 2016 #29
Greatest upset in 30 years Renew Deal Apr 2016 #32
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»538 had the Clinton Polls...»Reply #9