Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
30. Self-identified
Tue Apr 12, 2016, 10:27 PM
Apr 2016

The only data is from exit polls, so it has to be self-identified. But the reality is that Clinton does MUCH better in closed primaries. There can be no last second influx of "independent" voters.
Yep I take 538 with a pinch of salt they are on the Clinton dole GeorgiaPeanuts Apr 2016 #1
They are not, they just have a methodology that isn't perfect... pantsonfire Apr 2016 #2
Michigan's last competitive Presidential Primary was 1992 Trenzalore Apr 2016 #26
oops jcgoldie Apr 2016 #14
Who did 538 consult to unskew Michigan GeorgiaPeanuts Apr 2016 #22
I think you have your slogan jcgoldie Apr 2016 #23
That's embarrassing. ;) reformist2 Apr 2016 #3
Raises hope for whom?? nt BreakfastClub Apr 2016 #4
Turnout - motivation - is everything. JackRiddler Apr 2016 #5
I >99% agree with you, MoE, last week many people decide who to vote for.... pantsonfire Apr 2016 #6
Open primary vs closed primary. Apples and oranges Tarc Apr 2016 #7
Just google Michigan Open Primary.....n/t pantsonfire Apr 2016 #16
The Independents in Michigan caused that. DCBob Apr 2016 #8
No early voting paulthompson Apr 2016 #9
Wont matter... she already has big lead with regular LVs. DCBob Apr 2016 #11
Michigan was an open primary. NuclearDem Apr 2016 #10
Pollsters know about these things jfern Apr 2016 #13
Many of the polls way underestimated Adrahil Apr 2016 #19
People self indentified independents or registered independents? jfern Apr 2016 #25
Self-identified Adrahil Apr 2016 #30
Closed primaries have more self identified independents who are registered as Democrats jfern Apr 2016 #31
I'd agree with that. Adrahil Apr 2016 #33
I wonder if it was greater than 99.9% or 99.99%. Bernie narrowly winning NY would be less shocking jfern Apr 2016 #12
I was thinking Lysol percentage...so 99.99. n/t pantsonfire Apr 2016 #15
Woo-hoo, slam dunk for Bernie!!! pdsimdars Apr 2016 #17
Michigan was an open primary Adrahil Apr 2016 #18
Since then? What about all the other demographics? n/t pantsonfire Apr 2016 #20
The problem for Bernie jcgoldie Apr 2016 #21
He needs to win in NY and win about 56.5% from there to tie... pantsonfire Apr 2016 #24
Open primary Michigan. Closed in NY with no chance of changing affiliation. Buzz Clik Apr 2016 #27
Hillary was supposed to win Wisconsin as well Csainvestor Apr 2016 #28
yeah and that changed dramatically in the last week... pantsonfire Apr 2016 #29
Greatest upset in 30 years Renew Deal Apr 2016 #32
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»538 had the Clinton Polls...»Reply #30